Flow Through Pipes: Paraboloid Curve & Reason

  • Thread starter Thread starter wave525
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flow Pipes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the shape of the velocity profile of liquid flow through pipes, which is described as a paraboloid. This shape arises because the velocity is highest at the center of the pipe and decreases to zero at the walls due to friction. The velocity gradient can be calculated as a function of the distance from the center, leading to the parabolic equation. This phenomenon is consistent across different liquids, indicating that the shape is inherent to laminar flow dynamics. Understanding the calculations behind this profile is essential for grasping the underlying principles of fluid mechanics.
wave525
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
when any liquid flows through a pipe, the curve made by it is paraboloid, what is the reason for this shape. also the equation tells that it is independent of the liquid flowing through the pipe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"the curve made by it"?
You mean the velocity profile for laminar flow?

You can calculate the velocity gradient as function of the distance to the center, and derive the velocity profile based on that. See the Wikipedia article, for example.
 
i am talking about the velocity profile of the liquid, i know that from the equation it comes out to be a parabola equation, but what is its meaning, i mean why is it that velocity is maximum at the centre of the pipe and zero, at the corners?
 
zero at the wall -> friction
increasing towards the center -> further away from the area of zero velocity, more flow

If you know how to calculate it, try to understand the calculation. I think it is quite intuitive to follow those steps.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top