Fluid Mechanics Question: Calculation of kinematic velocity

thelovemonkey
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
hey guys I am new to the forum... i am a first year civil engineering student trying to do a second year course over this summer holiday. for fluid mechanics i was given this h/w problem. could you please tell me if I am correct and if not make explain where i went wrong and how to correct it?



Homework Statement


at 25 C a fluid has an absolute viscosity of 0.0978 Poise and a Specific Gravity of 0.997. Compute:
a. absolute viscosity in Ns/m^2
b. Kinematic viscosity in SI units


Homework Equations



Specific Gravity(SG)= Density of substance(Ds)/ Density of Water(Dw)

Kinematic Viscosity (KV) = Absolute Viscosity in SI units/ Density of Substance(Ds)

1 Poise= 0.1 Ns/m^2


The Attempt at a Solution




A.
if
1 Poise= 0.1 Ns/m^2

then

o.00978 Poise = 0.1 x 0.00978 Ns/m^2 = 0.000978 Ns/m^2


B.

KV= Abs. Viscosity/ Ds

SG= Ds/Dw

Ds= SG x Dw = 1000 kg/m^3 x 0.997 = 997kg/m^3


KV = (0.000978 Ns/m^2)/ (997 kg/m3)

=> KV= 9.8 x 10^-7 Nsm/Kg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes your work is correct.
 
the lecturer showed us a pretty neat way to handle these units...

Nsm/Kg ->

since N= Kg/m^2
then

units = m^2/ S


very late don't have time to rbeak down
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top