(Fluids) Material and local velocity and acceleration fields.

Lavabug
Messages
858
Reaction score
37

Homework Statement


The streamlines of a fluid are as follows:
x = (x0) + 3(y0)t^2
y = (y0)/(1 + 2t)
z = (z0) + 5(x0)t

Find the velocity and acceleration fields in the Eulerian description (local).


Homework Equations


Total/material acceleration: Dv/Dt = dv/dt + v.grad(v)


The Attempt at a Solution



I am given the trajectories of the fluid in Lagrangian form, meaning a function of the initial positions and time. If I set t=0 I get x=x0, y=y0, z=z0 as the initial positions. I then solve for the initial positions as a function of x,y,z and t.

Next I take the time derivative of streamlines I am given to get the velocity field in Lagrangian(material) form, after which I substitute x0, y0, z0, which gives me the velocity field in local (Eulerian) form.

How do I calculate the acceleration? I can take the time derivative of the material velocity (2nd time derivative of the streamlines given) and then substitute x0,y0,z0. I can also use the formula I suggested, using it on the velocity field in local form (no initial positions in it).

My prof insists that doing it either way is equivalent but I've gone through the math several times and it simply isn't. Can someone please clarify these concepts/definitions for me once and for all?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show the two procedures you are describing?
 
Here it is: http://img862.imageshack.us/img862/592/p1000992.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top