Flux from a given charge distribution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric flux through two spherical surfaces at radii 1.5m and 2.5m, given charge distributions on concentric spherical shells. The user correctly identifies that the flux can be determined using the enclosed charge and the equation flux = Qenc/ε0. They initially miscalculate the units, confusing flux with Coulombs instead of Webers, leading to concerns about the scale of their results. After clarification, they realize their calculations are correct, but express frustration with the learning process and the teaching style of their professor. The conversation highlights the challenges of understanding Gaussian surfaces and the importance of proper unit conversion in physics problems.
ryukyu
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three concentric spherical shells ,r=1m ,r=2m and r=3m, respectively, have charge
distributions 2, −4, and 5 μC/m2.

Calculate the flux through r=1.5m and r=2.5m



Homework Equations



Since we are talking about Gaussian surfaces I assume that the flux at 1.5m is just the flux contained in the 1m shell.

I'm particularly having trouble figuring out what to do with the data. Given that the charge distribution is given in uC/m^2, I assume we need to multiply this by the surface area of each sphere to find the total enclosed charge (Qenc).

Then I have that flux = Qenc0. But these answers seem way too high.


The Attempt at a Solution



SA1=4(pi)r2=4(pi)m2
Qenc1=4(pi)m2*2uC/m2=8(pi)uC
flux=8(pi)uC/ε0=2.84x106C
where ε0=(10-9/(36*pi))
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer is correct.
 
Thanks for the quick response. The whole mega-Coulomb just had me worried.
 
ryukyu said:
Thanks for the quick response. The whole mega-Coulomb just had me worried.
It is not mega -Coulomb. Flux is not measured in C, but in Weber.
 
I've got it straightened out now. I was assuming eps0 was unitless. But even given that enlightenment, are these really mega-Webers that seems even more out of scale?
 
No. It is not out of scale.
 
Thanks again. I have been working on the homework for this class for at least 30 hours on and off and it's only 7 problems. The professor's method of instruction and my method of learning just don't blend well and that's not his fault, I just need to learn a new way to learn.
 
Back
Top