How to Calculate Electric Flux for a Rotated Square in a Uniform Electric Field?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xcvxcvvc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux
AI Thread Summary
A uniform electric field of 25 kN/C is applied parallel to the z-axis, affecting a square with sides of 5.0 cm initially in the xy-plane. The electric flux for the square is calculated to be 63 Nm²/C. When the square is rotated 40 degrees about the x-axis, the flux decreases to 48 Nm²/C due to the angle of incidence, which is determined using the cosine function. If the square is rotated further so that its normal is parallel to the x-axis, no flux passes through it, resulting in a flux of 0. The discussion clarifies the relationship between the angle of rotation and electric flux through the surface.
xcvxcvvc
Messages
392
Reaction score
0
A uniform electric field of 25kN/C is directed parallel to the z-axis. A square of sides 5.0 cm is submersed in this field and initially located in the xy-plane. (a) Determine the electric flux for the square. (b) Repeat if the square is rotated 40.0 degrees about the x-axis. (c) Repeat if the square is moved again and this time its normal is parallel to the x-axis.




(a) 25*10^3 N/C * (5.0*10^-2 m)^2 = 62.5 = 63 Nm^2/C (this is right)

I don't understand how to set up (b) or (c). I'm trying to visualize rotating the square about the x-axis, but doesn't that make only four very slender slices of the square come in contact with the z-axis directed field?

answers:
1. a. 63 N m2/C
b. 48 N m2/C
c. 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For part b), you can probably see there's a relationship involving the angle. As the square is rotated throughout 90 degrees, the flux that passes through the square gradually decreases to 0. Thus, the trigonometric function you're looking for is cos:

63\cos{40} = 48

For c), the only situation in which the normal of the square will be parallel to the x-axis is when it has been rotated 90 degrees about the y-axis. Thus it no longer lies in the xy plane and no flux can pass through it.
 
LOL i thought the surface was a cube and i became really confused. Thanks, you helped. I completely understand it now.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top