Flux through a cube with non uniform electric field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating electric flux through a cube in a non-uniform electric field. The electric field is defined as E = (-5 N/C x m) i + (3 N/C x m) k, where i and k represent the x and z directions, respectively. The key formula for flux is the integral of E dot dA, but the participants clarify that for each face of the cube, this simplifies to E multiplied by the area A due to constant dA across each face. The flux is computed by evaluating the electric field at the respective coordinates for each face and summing the contributions, particularly focusing on the faces aligned with the x and z axes. This approach provides a clearer method for solving the flux problem despite initial confusion over the electric field representation.
purplex76
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
This is really frusterating me, my book provides horrible examples and i have no idea how to go about this problem.
There is a cube with sides L= .3m and an electric field = (-5 N/C X m) x i +(3 N/C x m) z k i= i hat k= k hat
I know that the flux = the integral of the E . dA (dot product), but the form that i have for the electric field is not making sense to me.
How can i find the electric flux through the faces of a cube when i am given the electric field mentioned above?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm guessing a bit, but it sounds like the electric field at a point (x,y,z) is

-5 x Newtons/columb-meter in the \hat i direction, and
3 z Newtons/columb-meter in the \hat k direction.

Usually \hat i points in the x direction, \hat j points in the y direction, and \hat k points in the z direction. Does this sound right?

If so, it shouldn't be too hard to integrate the flux through a cube face...
 
i'm still lost
 
What pervect is trying to say in fewer words than I'm about to say is you have the field given by -5x + 3z. The flux is the integral of E dot dA right? However, since dA does not change on each face throughout the face E dot dA becomes E*A for each face. Sum the flux on each face up. I'll help you out with a little of the math:

The cube has one face facing the positive and negative directions for x, y and z. For example, the flux on the face pointing in the positive/negative x direction is <-5x, 0, 3z> * (0.3^2). The only difference is the value of x for each face, where <i, j, k> is a vector. Now sum up all 6 faces (you can ignore the ones facing the +y and -y directions)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top