Flux through a cube with non uniform electric field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating electric flux through a cube in a non-uniform electric field. The electric field is defined as E = (-5 N/C x m) i + (3 N/C x m) k, where i and k represent the x and z directions, respectively. The key formula for flux is the integral of E dot dA, but the participants clarify that for each face of the cube, this simplifies to E multiplied by the area A due to constant dA across each face. The flux is computed by evaluating the electric field at the respective coordinates for each face and summing the contributions, particularly focusing on the faces aligned with the x and z axes. This approach provides a clearer method for solving the flux problem despite initial confusion over the electric field representation.
purplex76
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
This is really frusterating me, my book provides horrible examples and i have no idea how to go about this problem.
There is a cube with sides L= .3m and an electric field = (-5 N/C X m) x i +(3 N/C x m) z k i= i hat k= k hat
I know that the flux = the integral of the E . dA (dot product), but the form that i have for the electric field is not making sense to me.
How can i find the electric flux through the faces of a cube when i am given the electric field mentioned above?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm guessing a bit, but it sounds like the electric field at a point (x,y,z) is

-5 x Newtons/columb-meter in the \hat i direction, and
3 z Newtons/columb-meter in the \hat k direction.

Usually \hat i points in the x direction, \hat j points in the y direction, and \hat k points in the z direction. Does this sound right?

If so, it shouldn't be too hard to integrate the flux through a cube face...
 
i'm still lost
 
What pervect is trying to say in fewer words than I'm about to say is you have the field given by -5x + 3z. The flux is the integral of E dot dA right? However, since dA does not change on each face throughout the face E dot dA becomes E*A for each face. Sum the flux on each face up. I'll help you out with a little of the math:

The cube has one face facing the positive and negative directions for x, y and z. For example, the flux on the face pointing in the positive/negative x direction is <-5x, 0, 3z> * (0.3^2). The only difference is the value of x for each face, where <i, j, k> is a vector. Now sum up all 6 faces (you can ignore the ones facing the +y and -y directions)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top