Force and Electric field within a cubic lattice

AI Thread Summary
The net force on the Cs- ion at the center of the cubic lattice is zero due to the symmetrical arrangement of Cl+ ions at the corners, which exert equal and opposite forces. Consequently, the electric field at the center is also zero, as the opposing fields cancel each other out. However, the electric potential at that point is not zero; it can be calculated by summing the potentials from each Cl+ ion, which is a scalar quantity. The discussion highlights that while the electric field is zero at the center, it is not zero elsewhere in the cube. The approach to calculating potential energy through integration is acknowledged but deemed unnecessary for this problem.
VictorWutang
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There are Cl+ ions at the corners of a cube of side a = .4nm and a Cs- ion at the center.
a) What is the net force on the Cs- ion?
b) What is the electric field at the center of the cube cause by all of the Cl ions?
c) What is the electric potential at that point?



Homework Equations



F = kq1q2 / r2
E = kq / r
U


The Attempt at a Solution



a) Since each force has an equal force from the opposite corner, I think the net force should be 0. (seems too easy for a test problem, so please let me know if I'm wrong.)

B) For the same reasons as above, wouldn't E be 0?

C) really not sure where to go with this, guessing its an integral relying on the change in distance from each corner going from start position to infinity, and the the sum of those forces for each 8 corners.

Since it could move in a straight line through one of the faces, there would be 2 sets of 4 equal integrals, so I've gotten 4√(3)a/2Edr + 4-√(3)a/2Edr but even if this is right I have E = 0 so I can't do this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
VictorWutang said:

Homework Statement



There are Cl+ ions at the corners of a cube of side a = .4nm and a Cs- ion at the center.
a) What is the net force on the Cs- ion?
b) What is the electric field at the center of the cube cause by all of the Cl ions?
c) What is the electric potential at that point?



Homework Equations



F = kq1q2 / r2
E = kq / r
U


The Attempt at a Solution



a) Since each force has an equal force from the opposite corner, I think the net force should be 0. (seems too easy for a test problem, so please let me know if I'm wrong.)

B) For the same reasons as above, wouldn't E be 0?

C) really not sure where to go with this, guessing its an integral relying on the change in distance from each corner going from start position to infinity, and the the sum of those forces for each 8 corners.

Since it could move in a straight line through one of the faces, there would be 2 sets of 4 equal integrals, so I've gotten 4√(3)a/2Edr + 4-√(3)a/2Edr but even if this is right I have E = 0 so I can't do this.
Hello,
Of course the net electric field at the center is zero.There are symmetrically opposing fields from all vertices.The charges are of the same nature and electric field is a vector.So I think your reasoning for questions a and b is correct. Potential however is a scalar so it has no direction.Just add the potentials due to individual charges ,or for the sake of symmetry seen here multiply potential due to one charge by 8.As far as your integral is concerned (which I will consider a difficult task to work with) see that E=0 only at the center of the cube.(or cuboid)It is not zero anywhere else inside the cube(or cuboid).
(Okay just a side question not related to the topic .Chemistry is not one of my strengths but I think the question should assign negative charges to chlorine ions,isnt it? :smile: )
regards
Yukoel
 
so inside the integral is Edr = kq1q2/ r2dr

which, when integrated, is -kq1q2/r

And since ΔV = - ∫Edr so the value i get turns positive, which seems like it would be correct. Then i would just plug in the numbers.

is this right?
 
VictorWutang said:
so inside the integral is Edr = kq1q2/ r2dr

which, when integrated, is -kq1q2/r

And since ΔV = - ∫Edr so the value i get turns positive, which seems like it would be correct. Then i would just plug in the numbers.

is this right?

V is a function of the source charge only. What you are deriving is potential energy.Sign seems fine.
You can directly use the expression for potentials considering the point charges separately.Evaluating the integral is correct but unnecessary in your problem.
regards
Yukoel
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top