Is Thinking Distance Proportional to Speed in Car Braking?

AI Thread Summary
Thinking distance is directly proportional to speed, with the braking distance at 30mph being 13.5m and at 20mph being 6.0m. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the calculation of thinking distance at 20mph, suggesting a need for clarification on the question posed. Participants recommend using algebraic methods to derive a general equation for braking distance, incorporating variables for thinking time and deceleration. It is noted that the thinking distance cannot be accurately determined without additional information, such as total stopping distance or driver reaction time. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of clear definitions and assumptions in solving the problem.
Lols
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The braking distance for a car at 30mph is 13.5m and 6.0m at 20mph.
Thinking distance is directly proportional to speed. Show that the thinking distance at 20mph is 6.0 m. This question has baffled me, pls help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lols said:
The braking distance for a car [is] 6.0m at 20mph.
... Show that the thinking distance at 20mph is 6.0 m.
I think you must have misstated the question.
When you've sorted that out, try to write a general equation for braking distance in terms of whatever variables you deem relevant.
 
I've check
haruspex said:
I think you must have misstated the question.
When you've sorted that out, try to write a general equation for braking distance in terms of whatever variables you deem relevant.
ed
 
Lols said:
I've checked
Ok, but it can't be right. I suggest we just do it algebraically, so put variables for the given data and ignore the actual values for now.
Create another unknown variable for each of:
- think time
- deceleration while braking
Using those, write equations corresponding to the given information.
 
The thinking distance at 20 mph could be 6 m if the thinking time happens to be 0.671 s. The thinking distance depends on the thinking time, which isn't given. It could be deduced from some other information such as the total stopping distance including the thinking distance for some speed. Might there be something like that given in another part of the question?
 
"Thinking distance" means the distance the car travels within the reaction time of the driver?
As the two given braking distances do not include that, I don't see how we could make any statement about that distance without additional assumptions.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top