Force due to gravity inside planet

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the gravitational force inside a spherical planet with varying density. It is established that the maximum gravitational force occurs at the radius r = R/2, contrary to the expectation that it would be at the planet's surface (r = R). The calculations show that the force is proportional to r in the inner region and varies differently in the outer region. The participants confirm that the force at r = R/2 exceeds that at r = R, supporting the initial claim. The shell theorem is referenced to explain the gravitational effects in the hollowed-out region.
Undoubtedly0
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
Here is a simple problem in classical gravitation.

Consider a spherical planet of radius R, and let the radial coordinate r originate from the plant's center. If the density of the planet is ρ from 0 ≤ r < R/2 and ρ/3 from R/2 < r < R, then my work tells me that the maximum force due to gravity inside the planet is at r = R/2, not at r = R as one might expect.

0\leq r\leq R/2,\qquad F_G = \frac{Gm\left(\rho \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3\right)}{r^2} = \frac{4\pi}{3}Gm\rho r \\<br /> R/2 \leq r \leq R,\qquad F_G = \frac{Gm\left[ \rho\frac{4\pi}{3}\left(\frac{R}{2} \right)^3 + \frac{\rho}{3}\frac{4\pi}{3} \left( r^3 - \left(\frac{R}{2} \right)^3 \right) \right]}{r^2} = \frac{4\pi}{3}\frac{Gm\rho}{r^2}\left[ \left(\frac{R}{2} \right)^3 + \frac{1}{3}r^3 - \frac{1}{3}\left(\frac{R}{2} \right)^3 \right]

My work is above. Is this be correct, that the maximum force due to gravity would be at r = R/2? Thanks for your time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neglecting 4pi/3 Gmρ as prefactor:

In the inner part: ##F \propto r##
In the outer part: ##F \propto (\frac{R}{2})^3/r^2 + 1/3 (r-\frac{R}{2}) = \frac{1}{r^2} ((\frac{R}{2})^3+\frac{1}{3}r^3-\frac{1}{3}(\frac{R}{2})r^2)##

I get a different third term for the force.

##\frac{dF}{dr}=-\frac{R^3}{4r^3} + \frac{1}{3}## which is 0 at ##4r^3=3R^3##, it has a minimum in the less dense region.

F(R/2) > F(R), so I can confirm your result.
 
Thanks mfb. Regarding our difference, I think your third term might be mistaken. If we hollow out the planet from 0 ≤ r < R/2, then the force due to gravity in the domain R/2 ≤ r ≤ R is

F_G = \frac{Gm\frac{\rho}{3}}{r^2}\left[ \frac{4\pi}{3}r^3 - \frac{4\pi}{3}\left(\frac{R}{2}\right)^3\right]

By the shell theorem, it as if all the volume enclosed is contained in a point at the center. Do you agree?
 
Oh, you are right.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top