Force, Friction, Feel like I am not given sufficient info

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1MileCrash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Friction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the stopping distance of a train loaded with crates, given a static friction coefficient of 0.25 and an initial speed of 48 km/h. Participants clarify that the mass of the crates is irrelevant for the calculation, as it cancels out during the process. They emphasize that using a hypothetical mass simplifies the problem without affecting the outcome. The key point is that the acceleration required to prevent the crates from sliding is determined by the static friction coefficient alone. Ultimately, the focus is on understanding that mass does not influence the final answer in this scenario.
1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41

Homework Statement



The floor of a railroad car is loaded with loose crates, having a coefficient of static friction of 0.25 with the floor. If the train is initially moving at a speed of 48 km/h, in how short of a distance can the train be stopped without causing the crates to slide? (constant acceleration.)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I've worked the entirety of this chapter's problems and this is literally number 5 out of ten dozen. Can someone explain to me how I am supposed to go about this without mass or a normal force? I don't know what to do with just a coefficient of static friction..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1MileCrash said:

Homework Statement



The floor of a railroad car is loaded with loose crates, having a coefficient of static friction of 0.25 with the floor. If the train is initially moving at a speed of 48 km/h, in how short of a distance can the train be stopped without causing the crates to slide? (constant acceleration.)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I've worked the entirety of this chapter's problems and this is literally number 5 out of ten dozen. Can someone explain to me how I am supposed to go about this without mass or a normal force? I don't know what to do with just a coefficient of static friction..

Method #1. Since you are not given the mass of the crate(s), it clearly doesn't matter - so assume a nice convenient figure like 14 kg. [I always like any assumed mass to be even, so that fractions are not introduced when you calculate Kinetic Energy. 2 x 7 is good, since 7 is a prime number so you are not likely to get an incorrect answer by co-incidence. [note that 2+2 = 2x2 so you can get the correct answer by coincidence when working with just a 2]
As you go through the problem you will find you alternately multiply and divide by this mass showing it didn't matter what value you chose.

Method #2. Let the mass of the crate(s) be M. As you work through the problem you will find that M cancels out - so you will get a "number only" answer in the end.
 
I got it, I just called normal force mg, so acceleration needed to overcome max static friction was equal to ug.

Seems like weight matters in this case though. Wouldn't those crates be less likely to slide if I put 500kg of mass in them?
 
1MileCrash said:
I got it, I just called normal force mg, so acceleration needed to overcome max static friction was equal to ug.

Seems like weight matters in this case though. Wouldn't those crates be less likely to slide if I put 500kg of mass in them?

I might seem like the mas mattered, but your physics calculation just showed it doesn't. have faith! Trust the Force [calculation] Luke!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top