Force is mass times accelaration Question inside

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the force experienced during an impact when an object is moving at constant velocity, which theoretically suggests zero acceleration and thus zero force. Participants clarify that upon impact, the object decelerates rapidly, resulting in a significant force being felt. The equation F = m*a remains valid, as the acceleration changes during the collision. The conversation also hints at the relationship between force and momentum in collision scenarios. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for grasping the physics of impacts.
kunal.janu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
HI all

We know that Force = Mass * Acceleration

An object moving at constant velocity will have zero acceleration. So when it impact an object or a person, a force is felt. Equation above suggests that force is zero.

Please explain why this equation fails for this case, and a mathematical formula for deriving the force that is actually felt.

Awaiting answers
Kunal Janu
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thats becasue when you hit something, you decelerate.

The deceleration is generally very high if you hit a brick wall, hence a large force is felt.

Therefore the mathematical formula for the force you feel is...

F=m*a
 
Exactly, when you hit something, your acceleration is no longer zero.

You'll learn more about collisions when you get into momentum.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top