Force on a Slope: Solving for Acceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hisui
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Slope
AI Thread Summary
To solve for Franz's acceleration while skiing down a 50-degree slope, the mass can be represented as 'm', allowing for the calculation of acceleration in terms of 'm'. The kinetic friction coefficient is 0.05, which plays a crucial role in determining the net force acting on the skier. The forces acting along the slope include gravitational force and friction, which can be expressed mathematically. Ultimately, the mass 'm' cancels out in the calculations, simplifying the process. Understanding these concepts allows for the accurate determination of acceleration without needing the specific mass value.
Hisui
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Force on a slope

"Franz is skiing in the Alps. He is racing down a steep slope of 50.0 degrees. For waxed skis on snow, we have mu sub k (for kinetic friction)=0.05. What is his acceleration?"

I'm so confused... don't I need his mass to even begin to approach this or am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
let m be the mass... get the acceleration in terms of m... (the m's will cancel out when you work out the acceleration).

What is the force acting on the skier along the slope in terms of m...
 
Oh, right. Got it, thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top