Force on triangular current loop: line integrals

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the force on a triangular current loop influenced by an infinitely long wire. The magnetic field generated by the wire is established, and the total force on the loop is determined by dividing the problem into three segments. It is confirmed that only the x-component of the force is significant due to symmetry, as the y-components cancel each other out. The participants clarify the correct formulation of the differential length element, emphasizing that the relationship between x and y will inherently account for any sign changes. The conversation concludes with a mutual understanding of the approach to solving the line integrals correctly.
Bassalisk
Messages
946
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



http://pokit.org/get/img/65e8ba92c1d00bf7fc8be2b178757ed8.jpg

If a=5b, and I1 and I2 are known, find the force on the triangular loop.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



For start, the field from the infinitely long wire is :

\vec B=\large -\frac{\mu _{0} I_{1}}{2 \pi x}\vec a_{z}

This is understood and very trivial.

To find the total force on the current loop we will divide the problem into 3 parts, and solve forces on the (1) (2) (3) separately, and then add them all up.

For the force we will use the formula:

\vec F = I_{2} \int{\vec {dl} × \vec B}

From this current view I want first question answered:

Will the only \vec a_{x} component of the force be present?

I got that from the right hand rule, part of the y component vector-crossed with -z will give a positive x component.

The part with the x component crossed with the -z component will give both positive and negative contribution, leading to net 0 y component of the force.

Is this correct and if it is, i have further questions regarding the calculations and solving the line integrals, because I am getting weird answers.Namely in case (1) and (2).

Is \vec{dl} =dx \vec a_{x} + dy \vec a_{y} in both cases the same or is in second case \vec{dl} =-dx \vec a_{x} + dy \vec a_{y}.

If I use the fact that dl is in both cases the same, I get right results.

But keep in mind that when substituting dy in first case i used:

\vec{dy}=\frac {c}{2b} dx

and in second case:

\vec{dy}=-\frac {c}{2b} dx

I should also add that case 3 is not a problem because I got that right.

If i use \vec{dl} =-dx \vec a_{x} + dy \vec a_{y} I get a net y component of the force which is not right in my intuition.How do you solve these line integrals the right way?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bassalisk said:

Homework Statement



http://pokit.org/get/img/65e8ba92c1d00bf7fc8be2b178757ed8.jpg

If a=5b, and I1 and I2 are known, find the force on the triangular loop.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



For start, the field from the infinitely long wire is :

\vec B=\large -\frac{\mu _{0} I_{1}}{2 \pi x}\vec a_{z}

This is understood and very trivial.

To find the total force on the current loop we will divide the problem into 3 parts, and solve forces on the (1) (2) (3) separately, and then add them all up.

For the force we will use the formula:

\vec F = I_{2} \int{\vec {dl} × \vec B}

From this current view I want first question answered:

Will the only \vec a_{x} component of the force be present?

I got that from the right hand rule, part of the y component vector-crossed with -z will give a positive x component.

The part with the x component crossed with the -z component will give both positive and negative contribution, leading to net 0 y component of the force.

Is this correct and if it is, i have further questions regarding the calculations and solving the line integrals, because I am getting weird answers.
Yes, you're right. By symmetry, the vertical component of the forces will cancel, so any net force has to act in the horizontal direction.

Namely in case (1) and (2).

Is \vec{dl} =dx \vec a_{x} + dy \vec a_{y} in both cases the same or is in second case \vec{dl} =-dx \vec a_{x} + dy \vec a_{y}.

If I use the fact that dl is in both cases the same, I get right results.

But keep in mind that when substituting dy in first case i used:

\vec{dy}=\frac {c}{2b} dx

and in second case:

\vec{dy}=-\frac {c}{2b} dx

I should also add that case 3 is not a problem because I got that right.

If i use \vec{dl} =-dx \vec a_{x} + dy \vec a_{y} I get a net y component of the force which is not right in my intuition.How do you solve these line integrals the right way?
By definition, ##d\vec{l} = dx\,\vec{a}_x + dy\,\vec{a}_y + dz\,\vec{a}_z##. The relative sign dependence of the first two pieces will come in through the relationship between x and y, e.g. y=(2b/c)x or y=-(2b/c)x, and dz=0 for these contours.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
vela said:
Yes, you're right. By symmetry, the vertical component of the forces will cancel, so any net force has to act in the horizontal direction.By definition, ##d\vec{l} = dx\,\vec{a}_x + dy\,\vec{a}_y + dz\,\vec{a}_z##. The relative sign dependence of the first two pieces will come in through the relationship between x and y, e.g. y=(2b/c)x or y=-(2b/c)x, and dz=0 for these contours.

oh so I don't have to account for it in the differential of l?

It will account for it self when I change the dy into dx through that relationship?

Makes sense. Thank you for the answer. I actually did it this way, but this was purely shot in the dark because I knew the final answer.

Thank you for Your help, You have been very helpful.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top