Force required to negate vertical acceleration with friction

AI Thread Summary
To hold block m (16 kg) against block M (88 kg) on a frictionless surface with a coefficient of friction of 0.38, the minimum force required is approximately 487.65 N. This force accounts for the static friction needed to prevent m from sliding down due to gravity. The calculations involve determining the normal force and applying Newton's second law to both blocks. The discussion also highlights the importance of considering contact forces and Newton's third law in analyzing the system's dynamics. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving similar physics problems effectively.
Obliv
Messages
52
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


attachment.php?attachmentid=21016&stc=1&d=1255066014.jpg

Two blocks m (16kg) and M (88kg) are as shown in the figure. If the co-efficient of friction b/w the blocks is 0.38 but the surface beneath the block is frictionless, what is the minimum force required to hold m against M?

Homework Equations


Fnet = ma
Fs = μs*Fa

The Attempt at a Solution


By using this equation for m Fnety = mg - Fs = 0
One can find the force required Freq = (16*9.8) / μs to be 412.63N

From there I have read that because that is the force required on m on M, it is not the required applied force on the system. That comes out to be around ~487N using proportions. How is this part solved formally? Please be as formal as possible because I want to get this concept down fundamentally.
Thank you very much.

(side question regarding the concept of force transferring through a system of mass like this one: Say there was a basketball in space weighing 5kg. If you applied a force of 10N on it alone, it would accelerate at 2m/s2. If the basketball was connected, by a nearly massless rigid rod that extended millions of miles, to a rock weighing 5000kg, and you pushed on the basketball with 10N, would its acceleration ever change or would it be 10N/5005kg from beginning to end?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Obliv said:

Homework Statement


attachment.php?attachmentid=21016&stc=1&d=1255066014.jpg

Two blocks m (16kg) and M (88kg) are as shown in the figure. If the co-efficient of friction b/w the blocks is 0.38 but the surface beneath the block is frictionless, what is the minimum force required to hold m against M?

Homework Equations


Fnet = ma
Fs = μs*Fa

The Attempt at a Solution


By using this equation for m Fnety = mg - Fs = 0
One can find the force required Freq = (16*9.8) / μs to be 412.63N

From there I have read that because that is the force required on m on M, it is not the required applied force on the system. That comes out to be around ~487N using proportions. How is this part solved formally? Please be as formal as possible because I want to get this concept down fundamentally.
Thank you very much.

(side question regarding the concept of force transferring through a system of mass like this one: Say there was a basketball in space weighing 5kg. If you applied a force of 10N on it alone, it would accelerate at 2m/s2. If the basketball was connected, by a nearly massless rigid rod that extended millions of miles, to a rock weighing 5000kg, and you pushed on the basketball with 10N, would its acceleration ever change or would it be 10N/5005kg from beginning to end?)
It's generally recommended for problems such as this, to sketch an FBD (free body diagram) for each mass (object) involved.

What you have labeled as Fnet y is actually the minimum normal force required, between m and M, so that m doesn't slide down.
 
Well it's also the net force on m in the y-direction is it not? I thought the only forces acting on m are gravity and the static force of friction through the applied force.
FBD I drew quickly. That is what I see visually along with the image. Fa is equal in both FBD's, correct?
 
SammyS said:
What you have labeled as Fnet y is actually the minimum normal force required, between m and M, so that m doesn't slide down.
You mean, what is labelled Freq is the minimum normal force, yes?
Obliv, what is the relationship between the normal force and F? What is the relationship between the normal force and M?
 
What you have missed is the contact force effect on mass M, When you push something it moves. You have to add to that force the required force to make the two objects get the same acceleration.

A great place to understand fcontact is http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/newtlaws/lesson-3/double-trouble
When you push an objects it pushes back with the same force as an attempt to move it (Newton third law). So when you treat each object individually there should be a force acting leftward which in your case you will treat it as N ( Us * N)
So the force overall should be:
F - n = m a

Now after you figure things out you will end up with the answer.
 
  • Like
Likes Obliv
Biker said:
What you have missed is the contact force effect on mass M, When you push something it moves. You have to add to that force the required force to make the two objects get the same acceleration.

A great place to understand fcontact is http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/newtlaws/lesson-3/double-trouble
When you push an objects it pushes back with the same force as an attempt to move it (Newton third law). So when you treat each object individually there should be a force acting leftward which in your case you will treat it as N ( Us * N)
So the force overall should be:
F - n = m a

Now after you figure things out you will end up with the answer.

Thank you for that link. For some reason, Newton's third law did not occur to me.
for m -> Fnet = ma = FA - FC (contact force)
for M -> Fnet = Ma = Fc
for m in y-direction -> Fnet = may = Fs - mg = 0
Fs = μsFC = mg
FC = 412.63

Plugging the value of FC back into the net force equation for M yields a = 4.688m/s2 and using this information
Fnet = (16)(4.688) = FA - 412.63
FA = 487.65N

I finally get it :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top