Bassel AbdulSabour
- 8
- 0
Why are the resultant's X and Y components of two forces equal the sum of the X and Y components of the two forces?
The discussion centers around the question of why the resultant's X and Y components of two forces are equal to the sum of the X and Y components of those forces. It touches on theoretical aspects of vector addition and principles in classical mechanics.
Participants express varying perspectives on the foundational principles behind the equality of the components, with some agreeing on the mathematical and geometric interpretations while others introduce different considerations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of additional forces and the nature of the forces in question.
Some assumptions about the nature of forces and the context of their application are not explicitly stated, which may affect the interpretations of the principles discussed.
Why not? What else would they be equal to?Bassel AbdulSabour said:Why are the resultant's X and Y components of two forces equal the sum of the X and Y components of the two forces?
Because these are the addition laws of a vector space: ##\begin{bmatrix}u_x\\u_y\end{bmatrix}+\begin{bmatrix}v_x\\v_y\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}(u+v)_x\\(u+v)_y\end{bmatrix}\,.## This coincides with the geometric vector addition of arrows. But whatever you take as a definition, they should yield the same result.Bassel AbdulSabour said:Why are the resultant's X and Y components of two forces equal the sum of the X and Y components of the two forces?
It follows from one of the axioms of Classical mech.: the Principle of SuperpositionBassel AbdulSabour said:Why are the resultant's X and Y components of two forces equal the sum of the X and Y components of the two forces?