How do I find the other particular solution?

AI Thread Summary
To find the particular solution for the damped oscillator under the force F(t) = F0(1 - e-at), the discussion highlights the approach to solving the differential equation. The homogeneous solution is established as A*e-at*cos(at + θ), with initial conditions x(0) = 0 and x'(0) = 0. The first particular solution xp1 is straightforward, yielding xp1 = F0/2ma2. The challenge arises with the second particular solution xp2, where a trial function of the form x = C*e-at is suggested, leading to the correct form of the solution after applying initial conditions. The final solution is x(t) = F0/2ma2 * [√2*e-at*cos(at + π/4) + 1 - 2e-at].
FLms
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A Force F(t) = F0(1 - e-at), where both F0 and a are constants, acts over a damped oscillator. In t = 0, the oscillator is in it's equilibrium position. The mass of the oscillator is m, the spring constant is k = 2ma2 and the damping constant is b = 2ma.

Find x(t)

Homework Equations



Well, the differential equation is: d2x / dt2 + 2adx/dt + 2a2x = F0/m - F0/m * e-at

Also, x(0) = 0; x'(0) = 0.

The Attempt at a Solution



First, I tried to find the solution to the homogeneous equation associated.
So I tried a solution of the kind x = ept, and the I found: p2 + 2ap + 2 = 0
p = (-2a \pm \sqrt{-4a^2}) / 2
p = -a \pm ia

So, it's an under-dampeing case, which the general solution is A*e-at*cos(at + \theta).

Then I have to find the particular solutions, where xp1 = F0/m and xp2 = -F0/m * e-at.

xp1 is rather easy. C*xp1 = F0/m ; 2a2*xp1 = F0/m ; xp1 = F0/2ma2

Now I'm stuck at the other one. I tried solutions like x = C*ept and x = C*t2*ept (C = constant) and haven't got it right.

The answer is: x(t) = F0/ma2 * [\sqrt{2}*e-at*cos(at + P/4) + 1 - 2e-at]

How do I find the other particular solution? What am I missing?
(By the way, should this be here or in the Calculus sub-forum?)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
FLms said:
Now I'm stuck at the other one. I tried solutions like x = C*ept and x = C*t2*ept (C = constant) and haven't got it right.
...
How do I find the other particular solution? What am I missing?
(By the way, should this be here or in the Calculus sub-forum?)

Hi,

You're almost there. To xp2, if you select x = C*ept as trial function, the only case that will work is p=a.
 
I used the trial x_{p2} = C e^{-a t} and got close to the correct answer.

x_{p2} = C e^{-a t}
\dot{x}_{p2} = -a C e^{-a t}
\ddot{x}_{p2} = a^2 C e^{_a t}

Substituting:

a^2 C + 2 a^2 C - 2 a^2 C = \frac{-F_0}{m}
C = \frac{F_0}{m a^2}

So:

x(t) = A e^{-at}cos(at + \theta) + \frac{F_0}{2ma^2} - \frac{F_0}{ma^2} e^{-at}

Applying the initial conditions:

x(0) = 0 = A cos(\theta) - \frac{F_0}{2ma^2}
\dot{x}(0) = 0 = -a A cos(\theta) - a A sin(\theta) + \frac{F_0}{m a}

Substituting A cos(\theta) = \frac{F_0}{2 m a^2} on the second equation:

A sin(\theta) = \frac{F_0}{2 m a^2}

A sin(\theta) = A cos(\theta)
\theta = \frac{\pi}{4}

Then:

A cos(\frac{\pi}{4}) = \frac{F_0}{2 m a^2}

A = \frac{\sqrt{2} F_0} {2 m a^2}

And, finally:

x(t) = \frac{F_0}{2 m a^2} [\sqrt{2} e^{-at} cos(a t + \frac{\pi}{4}) + 1 - 2 e^{-a t}]

Still can't see what's wrong, or whatever I'm missing...
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top