Forced Oscillations (proving diff equation by subsitution)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a differential equation related to forced oscillations, specifically proving its validity for any time t. The user successfully demonstrated the equation's correctness for t = -phi/w but struggles with the case when t = (pi/2 - phi)/w, particularly in eliminating the variable k. They note that substituting sin = 0 simplifies the problem, but substituting cos = 0 complicates it. Clarifications are sought regarding the natural frequency and the relationship between variables. The conversation emphasizes the need to derive equations for A and phi based on the parameters of the driving force, w, and F_nat.
hjr
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


By substituting the proper equations I showed that the equation is right when time = phi/w.
Now when I make cos = o and sin = 1 and time = (pi/2 - phi)/w I can't solve the equation.


Homework Equations


If you need to see all the equations i can give it to you but I am pretty sure at this stage they are not needed. The original diff equation is:

m*dx^2 + b* dx + kx = F_nat*cos(wt)


with x equal to:

Asin(wt + phi)

A = F-nat/ mh where h = \sqrt{(\omega^{2}-\omega_{0}^{2})^{2} + b^{2}\omega^{2}/m^{2}}

tan(\phi) = \frac{ (\omega^{2}-\omega_{0}^{2})}{\omega(b/m)}

The Attempt at a Solution



when time = (pi/2 - phi)/w

i got:

F-nat/m * (k-mw^2) = f-nat * (w-nat^2 - w^2)

in my book in a different example you can solve for k and get mw^2 but then that side will be zero. But then the natural frequency has to equal the external forces frequency to make that side zero. I just need a hint. Sorry if this is all a mess. If you need anything clarify I will try my best to do it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not too entirely sure as to what you are looking to find. Could you please clarify a bit?
 
The solution is x=Asin(wt + phi) if A and phi have the appropriate values which depend on the parameters of the diving force, w and F_nat. You can determine these values by substituting x(t) and its derivatives into the differential equation.This equation has to be true for all values of t. Substitute t=-phi/w, (it is minus!) you get a relation between A, phi and w and F_nat. Substitute t=pi/2-phi/w, you get a second equation. You can solve this system of equations for A and phi in terms of w and F_nat.

ehild
 
Yeah i should of been more clearer, A and phi were already given. I have to prove that the equation is valid for any time t. I did it for t = -phi/w which I was able to show/prove that it does work. Now when i do t=(pi/2-phi/w) i get the solution above but I can't figure out how to get rid of k. The only solution I could think of was that it must be zero on both sides. I am going to edit the question to make it clearer.
 
yea so these are the equations i was given. When i make sin = 0 i can make it work but when cos = o i can't figure out how to get rid of k.
 
What do you mean on w-nat? Or is it w0?

As for k, you know that w02=k/m. If you mean f-nat the same as F-nat, the two sides of the equation are equivalent .ehild
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top