Forces between charges. Did the problem, have question on the result.

  • Thread starter Thread starter frozenguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding vector subtraction in the context of forces between point charges arranged in an equilateral triangle. A participant questions the validity of their calculations after obtaining a negative vector magnitude, mistakenly believing that vectors cannot be negative. Clarification is provided that vectors can indeed be negative, representing direction rather than invalidating the calculation. The importance of understanding vector addition and subtraction is emphasized, noting that subtracting vectors is equivalent to adding negative vectors. The conversation concludes with a suggestion to seek clarification from the physics teacher regarding the teaching of vector concepts.
frozenguy
Messages
186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three point charges are located at the corners of an equilateral triangle with side length a=0.50m


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


My question is how can I subtract the vector F2/1? Vectors can't be negative right? I found the magnitude of the vector to be negative. Should I have not included the negative sign for the 4 micro coulomb charge? Then I add the two vectors and that will give me the correct result.

My result is correct, but I can't minus vectors so I kind of did it illegally ya?

Thanks for your help.
physics230chp234.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think that vectors can't be negative? You can subtract vectors with no problem, whoever told you this was wrong. A negative vector is an arrow pointing in the opposite direction of whatever the unit vector is. basically the vector itself isn't negative, but the magnitude is negative. for example if I have a vector 3x (3 in the x direction) it represents an arrow of magnitude 3 pointing in the x direction. --->. A vector -3x (-3 in the x direction) just represents an arrow of magnitue -3 in the x direction. <---. Don't get confused by the term "vector addition". When we subtract, all we are really doing is adding a negative number. Subtracting vectors is solely adding vectors of negative magnitude. Which is totally fine.
 
Hellabyte said:
Why do you think that vectors can't be negative? You can subtract vectors with no problem, whoever told you this was wrong. A negative vector is an arrow pointing in the opposite direction of whatever the unit vector is. basically the vector itself isn't negative, but the magnitude is negative. for example if I have a vector 3x (3 in the x direction) it represents an arrow of magnitude 3 pointing in the x direction. --->. A vector -3x (-3 in the x direction) just represents an arrow of magnitue -3 in the x direction. <---. Don't get confused by the term "vector addition". When we subtract, all we are really doing is adding a negative number. Subtracting vectors is solely adding vectors of negative magnitude. Which is totally fine.

Ok, that sounds very familiar to how I studied it in math.

I don't know why I can get confused with vectors.. I think its because my intro to physics teacher said that only magnitudes (scalars) are positive. If your vector comes up negative, you have initially set it in the wrong direction.

I know part of that is true, or maybe all if it in a way, I just interpreted the first part wrong I think..

So the work I wrote is correct? By adding the vectors, I subtract the components of F2/1 from F3/1
 
Yeah it looks fine to me, i don't have time to look into detail. You should talk to your physics teacher and tell him that the way he is saying it is confusing. I am sure he will appreciate feedback on his teaching.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top