Forces/Moments on Complex Beam System

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a university project involving micro-mechanical interactions between an AFM probe and a sample surface, focusing on a complex beam system. The user is struggling with the mechanics of a bending cantilever beam and seeks assistance in determining the Fz/Fy components and moments on the sample surface from the probe tip. Key points include the need to clarify the role of friction in the system, as it may affect the static equilibrium analysis. The user acknowledges a mistake in the Free Body Diagram and questions whether the probe tip will move in response to the beam's bending. Overall, the user is looking for guidance to navigate the complexities of their project.
Graham1874
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
To give a bit of context, I am doing my final year university project on micro-mechanical interactions between an AFM probe and a sample surface. I do not have notes for a system this complicated, as we always considered our systems to be rigid bodies. I was always relatively clueless at mechanics so this particular small part of my project is a nightmare for me!

I have labelled the Free Body Diagram attached, but the following information should help to explain further:

Section A has a downwards-vertical displacement being applied, and can be considered a rigid body, fixed in all other DOFs.
A key feature of this system is the bending cantilever beam (Section B as marked in FBD).
It begins with an angle of 13 degrees from the horizontal axis, the inclined beam can be seen on the image FBD.
Section C (probe tip) can also be assumed to be a rigid body.
Section D is the sample surface which can be assumed rigid and fixed in all DOFs.

How do I get to the solution for finding Fz/Fy components and moments on the sample surface from the probe tip?

I have not given values for the system because I want to use the help provided to work through it myself.

As I say, this is a relative nightmare for me and I don't really know where to start, so all help will be greatly appreciated.

I'm sure I'll need to provide more information to helpers, so these will be answered in EDITS below.
 

Attachments

  • FBD.jpg
    FBD.jpg
    18.8 KB · Views: 407
Engineering news on Phys.org
The diagram looks a bit odd because you show a straight and bent version of the beam yet A is in the same place. In consequence, the angle at which B joins A seems to change. I assume that is not the case.
You show Fy. Is there friction to be taken into account at the probe? If not, there will be no Fy; if there is it is going to complicate matters.
 
  • Like
Likes Graham1874
haruspex said:
The diagram looks a bit odd because you show a straight and bent version of the beam yet A is in the same place. In consequence, the angle at which B joins A seems to change. I assume that is not the case.
You show Fy. Is there friction to be taken into account at the probe? If not, there will be no Fy; if there is it is going to complicate matters.

Hi haruspex,

You're right, my diagram is incorrect with respect to the illustrated bending section. Linked to this, I am not sure if the probe tip will move in the negative y-direction (horizontal) to accommodate for the horizontal component of the length being decreased due to the bending? If this question doesn't make sense then please let me know and I will try to clarify.

With regards to your question about friction: I am still questioning whether friction shall be taken into account. I want to study the system in static equilibrium, so I think that friction might need to be included, otherwise the beam would straighten itself by moving the probe tip (Section C) in the positive y-direction as Section A is displaced downwards (unless my intuition is incorrect?).

I should add, I posted this question in the Homework forum and Nidum is kindly trying to help me so would you be inclined to join the discussion there? Might be best to finish the clarifications here before moving to the other thread. However, it is here for your interest: https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...al-eng-forces-moments-on-complex-beam.883145/

Thanks for you reply! I would appreciate any further input, or if you have any other questions then please feel free to ask.
 
Last edited:
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top