Forces problem: a donkey pulling a cart

  • Thread starter Thread starter N_L_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cart Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a donkey pulling a cart, focusing on calculating forces and friction. In Part A, the calculations for the coefficient of kinetic friction and the normal force exerted on the donkey appear correct, with a coefficient of 0.381 derived. Part B introduces acceleration, prompting a reevaluation of forces, where the applied force by the donkey is calculated to be 2000.42 N, but there is confusion regarding the mass used in the calculations. The conversation highlights a deeper philosophical issue regarding Newton's laws, specifically the relationship between action and reaction forces, and how they apply to motion. The complexity of the problem has historically challenged students and professors alike, illustrating common misconceptions in understanding physics principles.
N_L_
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I worked out the following problem, but I am unsure of my answers. Do they look correct?


Part A

A 255 kg donkey is pulling on a cart with a horizontal force of 1940 N. The mass of the cart is 520 kg and the cart is rolling at a constant velocity of 0.72 meters / second to the left. Find:

a) The coefficient of kinetic friction for the wheel's bearings on the cart.
b) The force exerted on the donkey by the surface.

What I have:

constant velocity = zero acceleration

The sum of the forces on the in the X direction = Fapp - Ffr = 0

1940 N - Mu (9.8 * 520) = 0

Mu for the cart = .381

The force exerted on the donkey by the surface = Fnormal. Fn = m*g = 2499 N


Part B

The same donkey is pulling on the same cart, but now the cart is accelerating at 0.24 m/s^2 to the left. Find:


a) The force by the donkey on the cart

b) The force by the surface on the donkey


The sum of the forces in the X direction = Fapp - Ffr = 255 * 0.24

Fapp - (Mu)(9.8)(255) = 61.2


From the previous part of the problem, Mu = .776

Fapp = 2000.42 N

Fn = 9.8 * 255 = 2499 N
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A)
The first part looks good, but in b the surface exerts force on the donkey on the X axis to. If it didn't then the donkey would just tread in place without being able to move.
B)
You wrote: Fapp - Ffr = 255 * 0.24 , but you're looking at the forces on the cart. Whose mass are you using?
 
Thank you for your help.
 
This is an ancient problem that I first read as a teenager in the 50s in "The World of Mathematics" by Newman. It is not an ordinary physics problem involving friction, etc. The conundrum, properly stated, is that the force the the donkey exerts on the cart is equal and opposite to the force that the cart exerts on the donkey. These forces add to zero according the the Third Law, so how can the donkey pull the cart? At parties in grad school in the 60s, not one physics professor was able to answer this problem correctly in terms of Newton's Laws. The problem is the indirection of referring to the 3rd law. It is the 2nd law that controls the motion of the cart. The motion of a body is controlled by all the forces exerted on *it*, not the forces it exerts on other bodies. When I was a professor, not one student ever got this problem completely right even though they were asked it on every quiz, and tutored in section. All I had to do was replace the donkey pulling a cart with a bee landing on a flower, or a pitcher throwing a ball to completely confuse them, because they didn't understand Newton's laws. Few do. Almost all of us are Artistotelians in daily life. The fact that the reciprocal forces add to zero is of course just a restatement of the law of conservation of momentum.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top