Forces that depend only on distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter fisico30
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
Forces that depend solely on distance, such as Coulomb's force, exhibit time-invariant characteristics at specific locations, but the force changes as objects move to new positions. In classical mechanics, the equations of motion remain invariant under changes in inertial reference frames, as demonstrated by Galilean transformations. This invariance applies regardless of whether forces are time-dependent or independent. In relativistic physics, the equations are also covariant under Lorentz transformations, reinforcing that time independence is not a requirement for invariance. Overall, the discussion emphasizes that the fundamental laws of motion maintain their form across different frames of reference.
fisico30
Messages
362
Reaction score
0
It is said that if a force depends only on distance (And not on time), the equations that involve those forces are invariant to a change of the frame of reference...is this true?

Coulomb's force law is only dependent on distance. At a certain space location the force has a value that does not change with time. But after the object is subjected to that force, it moves to a new spatial position and the force on it changes. So there is a change with time...

A time changing source generates a time changing field and therefore a time changing force on an object... what is special about these type of forces? Why don't they fit in the frame of reference transformations? after all, in classical mechanics time is absolute and distance differences are invariant...

thanks,
fisico30
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
in classical mechanics, motion equations are invariant to changes of inertial reference frame.
Imagine the force acting on a particle given as a function of coordinates and time. Consider two mutually moving frames, with nocoinciding origins O, O'. The coordinates in these frames are related by Galilei transformation, which in the simplest case of two equally oriented coordinated systems and motion od S' along x with velocity v is

<br /> x&#039; = x - vt,<br /> y&#039; = y,<br /> z&#039; = z,<br /> t&#039; = t.<br />

(In general, x,y,z would enter in some linear combinatinons, but t' would be always t). Then in S and S' frames the equations of motion are

<br /> \mathbf F(x,y,z, t) = m\mathbf a(t)~~,~~\mathbf F&#039;(x&#039;,y&#039;,z&#039;, t) = m\mathbf a&#039;(t).<br />

The equations looks the same - every frame use its coordinates to describe the particle, but the form of law is the same. We say that Newton's law of motion is covariant with respect to Galilean transformations coordinates. Furthermore, because frames are inertial, forces are the same

<br /> \mathbf F(x,y,z, t) = \mathbf F&#039; (x&#039;,y&#039;,z&#039;, t).<br />

There is no need to have the time independent force; equations are covariant in general.

In relativistic description (which is closer to reality), the equations are again covariant in respect to, but Lorentz transformation of coordinates, which in our special case is

<br /> x&#039; = \gamma(x - vt),<br /> y&#039; = y,<br /> z&#039; = z,<br /> t&#039; = \gamma(t-vx/c^2).<br />

For example, the law of motion of a particle in EM field is in S

<br /> qF^\mu_{~\nu}(x,y,z,t) u^\nu(t) = m\frac{d^2 x^\mu}{d\tau^2}(t)<br />

and in S'

<br /> qF&#039;^\mu_{~\nu}(x&#039;,y&#039;,z&#039;,t&#039;) u^\nu(t&#039;) = m\frac{d^2 x&#039;^\mu}{d\tau^2}(t&#039;).<br />

So there is no need to have the time independent force - formulae are invariant with respect to spacetime coordinate transformations in general.

Jano
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
4K
Replies
131
Views
7K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
6K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
3K
Back
Top