Formulation of orbital kinetic energy

Woodles
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
For a radial potential proportional to r^k, the virial theorem says \bar{T}=c(k)\bar{V}. My problem says to show that c(k)=k/2 for a circular orbit.

I actually solved the problem all ready (by setting the gradiant of the potential equal to the centripetal force and solving for 1/2*m*v^2.)

However, while I was looking around, I came across something.

I found a formulation of kinetic energy saying that \bar{T}= 1/2 \vec{∇}(V) .\vec{r}.

How could you derive this? Is it true? Why? The original post said this came from the virial theorem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just integrate with respect to time in the LHS and you'll get it.

\frac{m}{2} \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \frac{dr}{dt}\left(\frac{dr}{dt} dt\right) = ...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top