Fourier Series Solution of 1-D Heat Flow

Curtis15
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Length of rod = 1

Initial Conditions: u(x,0)=sin(πx)

Boundary conditions: u(0,t)=0 and u(1,t)=5.


Alright I am supposed to find the temperature at all times, but I am curious about the setup of the problem itself.

When x = 1, the boundary condition says that u = 5.

When t = 0, the initial condition says that u = sin(x∏).

So u(1,0) is supposed to equal what exactly? The boundary says it should be 5, but the initial condition says that sin(∏) = 0, so what would the answer be. I feel like this is contradictory but people are saying that it isn't and I am an idiot.

I have asked this somewhere else and got responses just saying this was a stupid question.


Thanks for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're right, it is contradictory. You should ask for clarification at your instructor.

A possible way to interpret the problem is that the ##u(1,t)=5## condition only holds for large ##t## and not for all ##t##.
 
micromass said:
You're right, it is contradictory. You should ask for clarification at your instructor.

A possible way to interpret the problem is that the ##u(1,t)=5## condition only holds for large ##t## and not for all ##t##.

You have no idea how much I appreciate this response. Thank you very much!
 
@curtis15: You didn't specify for what ##t## your boundary conditions ##u(0,t)=0,\ u(1,t)=5## apply. A reasonable interpretation would be for ##t>0##. Or you could think of the bar having the initial temperature distribution ##u(x,0) = \sin(\pi x)## suddenly inserted into a situation with those boundary conditions. I don't think there is anything contradictory here and working the problem should be straightforward.

[Edit, added later:] Another reasonable interpretation is to assume the initial condition ##u(x,0) = \sin(\pi x)## holds for ##0 < x < 1##. That works even better intuitively.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top