Fourier Series Solution of 1-D Heat Flow

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a one-dimensional heat flow scenario with a rod of length 1. The initial condition specifies the temperature distribution as u(x,0) = sin(πx), while the boundary conditions state that u(0,t) = 0 and u(1,t) = 5. Participants are exploring the implications of these conditions, particularly the apparent contradiction between the initial and boundary conditions at x = 1.

Discussion Character

  • Assumption checking, Problem interpretation, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the consistency of the initial and boundary conditions, particularly at the point x = 1. Some suggest that the boundary condition may only apply for large t, while others propose that the initial condition could be interpreted as holding for 0 < x < 1.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing interpretations and clarifications regarding the conditions. Some guidance has been offered on how to approach the apparent contradiction, though there is no explicit consensus on the interpretation of the conditions.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of specification regarding the time variable t in relation to the boundary conditions, which may contribute to the confusion. Participants are encouraged to seek clarification from their instructor.

Curtis15
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Length of rod = 1

Initial Conditions: u(x,0)=sin(πx)

Boundary conditions: u(0,t)=0 and u(1,t)=5.


Alright I am supposed to find the temperature at all times, but I am curious about the setup of the problem itself.

When x = 1, the boundary condition says that u = 5.

When t = 0, the initial condition says that u = sin(x∏).

So u(1,0) is supposed to equal what exactly? The boundary says it should be 5, but the initial condition says that sin(∏) = 0, so what would the answer be. I feel like this is contradictory but people are saying that it isn't and I am an idiot.

I have asked this somewhere else and got responses just saying this was a stupid question.


Thanks for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're right, it is contradictory. You should ask for clarification at your instructor.

A possible way to interpret the problem is that the ##u(1,t)=5## condition only holds for large ##t## and not for all ##t##.
 
micromass said:
You're right, it is contradictory. You should ask for clarification at your instructor.

A possible way to interpret the problem is that the ##u(1,t)=5## condition only holds for large ##t## and not for all ##t##.

You have no idea how much I appreciate this response. Thank you very much!
 
@curtis15: You didn't specify for what ##t## your boundary conditions ##u(0,t)=0,\ u(1,t)=5## apply. A reasonable interpretation would be for ##t>0##. Or you could think of the bar having the initial temperature distribution ##u(x,0) = \sin(\pi x)## suddenly inserted into a situation with those boundary conditions. I don't think there is anything contradictory here and working the problem should be straightforward.

[Edit, added later:] Another reasonable interpretation is to assume the initial condition ##u(x,0) = \sin(\pi x)## holds for ##0 < x < 1##. That works even better intuitively.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K