Fraction Of The Intensity Incident

  • Thread starter Thread starter lilkrazyrae
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction Intensity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the fraction of intensity that passes through two crossed Polaroid filters when the analyzer is rotated. The user initially calculates the transmitted intensity using the formula I2 = (1/2) Io cos^2(theta), applying an angle of 227.5 degrees. However, there is confusion regarding whether the angle should be 55 degrees instead. Clarification is sought on the correct angle to use in the calculation. The final answer hinges on confirming the appropriate angle for accurate results.
lilkrazyrae
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Two Polaroid filters are initially crossed. The analyzer is rotated through an angle of 55.0 degrees. Find the fraction of the intensity incident on the polarizer which passes the analyzer.

I used
I1=1/2 Io
I2= I1cos
I2= 1/2 Io cos^2(theta)
= 1/2 Io cos227.5°
= .393 Io

Is this correct or should the angle be 55 degrees??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just want to know if anyone has an idea if this is correct?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top