Framework Problem: Constructing Engine Mount for Airplane

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on constructing a framework for an engine mount in an airplane, specifically addressing challenges in hand calculations for a 3-D structure. The user has successfully utilized CAD software (Creo) for simulations but struggles with creating an accurate equation system using directional cosines. The conversation emphasizes the importance of simplifying the analysis by treating the two frames independently and focusing on the specific forces acting on the structure, including gravitational (mg) and thrust forces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 3-dimensional structural analysis
  • Proficiency in CAD software, specifically Creo
  • Knowledge of directional cosines in engineering calculations
  • Familiarity with static load analysis and force components
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for simplifying 3-D structural analysis in engineering
  • Learn about independent frame analysis techniques
  • Study the application of directional cosines in structural calculations
  • Explore the effects of thrust and gravitational forces on structural integrity
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, aerospace designers, and students involved in structural analysis and design of aircraft components, particularly those focusing on engine mounts and load distribution.

MECHIS
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi!
I'm currently doing a project where I'm constructing a framework for an engine mount connecting an airplane with an engine. The project involves both calculations by hand and with CAD(Creo), and i have no problem with the CAD part as i have done the simulations.
The part with doing calculations by hand have caused some problems where I'm doing the calculations in 3-D, and its causing some problems.
The top and bottom diagonals are not to be considered in the calculation by hand. Therefore you have 6 symmetrical beams.
So far what I have done in the calculations is that I've created a equation system with help of directional cosines which seems to get me the wrong answers. So I'm looking for some help in creating the equations system for this problem.
 

Attachments

  • beams1-8.png
    beams1-8.png
    21.9 KB · Views: 511
  • beams1-8.png
    beams1-8.png
    21.9 KB · Views: 504
  • coordinatesxyz.png
    coordinatesxyz.png
    20.2 KB · Views: 536
Engineering news on Phys.org
upload_2017-5-3_22-48-55.png


I don't understand .

If you take the top and bottom diagonals away then you just have two independent frames .

The three components of anyone of the frames are all in the same plane . For any likely system of loads and fixations the analysis is trivial ?
 
Nidum said:
View attachment 198290

I don't understand .

If you take the top and bottom diagonals away then you just have two independent frames .

The three components of anyone of the frames are all in the same plane . For any likely system of loads and fixations the analysis is trivial ?

Thanks for the answer Nidium! So what you're suggesting is that we divide the two frames and calculate the forces on one of the pairs, then suggest symmetry?

I also forgot to mention that we have two different forces affecting the framework, one is mg and one is thrust force.

We can't seem to get this right on account of having little knowledge in 3-dimensional calculations.
 

Attachments

  • coordinatesv2.PNG
    coordinatesv2.PNG
    21.5 KB · Views: 482
If you are trying to create a composite equation including all elements and loads then you are making the problem more difficult than it needs to be. You would be better off to simply do independent analyses on the different frame structure sections. By transferring the thrust load and the lateral force moment to the back plate then analyzing those loads independently and summing those results the analysis should be straight forward. Since mg is still a force load its components should be able to be combined with static lateral and thrust loads.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
680
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
12K