Fraunhofer diffraction for a small obstracle

Mahasweta
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
1. Two towers built on hills are 50 km apart and the line joining those passes above a hill midway between them. what is the longest wavelength of radio waves which can be sent between the towers without serious diffraction effects caused by the central hill?


2. Is the width of the obstrucle in necessary?



3. I think the problem can be related to Fraunhofer diffraction for a small obstracle. The condition for this type of diffraction is R≥ a^2/λ. But this requires the maximum width of obstracle.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the transmitter used extremely short wavelengths - what would happen?
Notice that the line joining the towers passes above the hill.
 
But in case I want some approximate numerical value of the wavelength that can pass without any diffraction effect? What should I do?
 
Mahasweta said:
But in case I want some approximate numerical value of the wavelength that can pass without any diffraction effect? What should I do?
What you do, to start with, is answer the question in post #2. You should also follow suggestions.
I'll only show you one step at a time because you are the one who has to take the steps, and everyone's path is different.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top