Free fall of straight wire in a homogeneous magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
A straight horizontal wire falling freely in a homogeneous magnetic field generates inductive voltage, which can be calculated using two different approaches. The first method yields E = Blv, where v is the instantaneous velocity, leading to instantaneous EMF. The second method, using E = ΔΦ/Δt, results in E = 1/2Blgt, which accounts for average velocity over time. The difference arises because the first equation considers instantaneous conditions, while the second reflects average conditions due to the wire's acceleration. Both equations are valid but apply to different contexts of EMF calculation.
alkmini
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
hello every body. I have a high school problem
a straight horizontal wire is falling freely in a homogeneous horizontal magnetic field, perpendicular to the wire and i want to find the inductive voltage.
I said E= Blv=Blgt
But I can also say E=ΔΦ/Δt=BΔΑ/Δt=Βl1/2gt [t][2]/Δt=1/2Blgt
why doew this difference of 1/2 arise?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hummm...

Your problem arises because of something like this:v = gt, but... v = 1/2gt too?

That's because on the first equation, you were finding INSTANTANEOUS velocity, so therefore INSTANTANEOUS EMF.
On the second equation, you somehow got average velocity... I'm still trying to figure it out.

A-ha! Okay, I think I got it figured out.
When you substituted 1/2gt for X, and divided by t to get 1/2gt, you actually found the average velocity, since it's NOT instantaneous velocity. The velocity constantly changes because the wire is accelerating.

Both of your equations are right, except the first one is instantaneous EMF after a certain T, and the second equation is average EMF with respect to T.
 
Last edited:
thanks a lot
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top