Free (mostly) Expansion of an Ideal Gas

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the gauge pressure in an insulated container filled with air, which is heated at a known rate, causing mass flow through an orifice. The initial conditions include a temperature of 300K, pressure of 1 atm, a container volume of 0.0033 m^3, and an orifice area of 9.0E-6 m^2. Participants are asked to derive a formula for pressure as a function of the rate of temperature change and to calculate the resulting gauge pressure based on the provided parameters. One contributor noted that their analysis required several assumptions and used the ideal gas and Bernoulli equations, resulting in a gauge pressure estimate of 2.4E-6 mbar. The discussion highlights the complexity of the problem and the need for clarity on the assumptions made in the calculations.
Slader99
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey All,

Had a problem to solve and wanted to know how others would approach it. Problem is as follows:

An insulated container of known volume has an orifice of know size. Container is filled with air and left to rest so that temperature and pressure is that of atmospheric surroundings. Container air is heated at a know rate which causes mass flow through orifice. What is the container pressure (gauge) resulting from the heating of said air?

Givens:
1) Initial temp is 300K and initial pressure 1atm.
2) Volume of container is 0.0033m^3
3) Orifice is circular of area 9.0E-6 m^2
4) Rate of temperature change is 1C/min

If you were to craft a formula for pressure as a function of rate of temperature change what would it look like? If you were to solve for pressure based on the givens above what would you get for Pgauge?

When I did the exercise I had to make more assumptions than I’m comfortable with. I ended up using the ideal gas & Bernoulli equation to arrive at a value in the range of 2.4E-6 mbar.


Thanks!
slader99
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is impossible to help this person without knowing what he has done in his own analysis.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top