Frictionless Bank: Normal Force vs. Weight

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rawr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frictionless
AI Thread Summary
In a frictionless banked curve, the horizontal component of the normal force is responsible for holding the car in place, not the weight. The weight acts vertically and does not contribute a horizontal component. The normal force, which is perpendicular to the banked surface, has both vertical and horizontal components due to the angle of the bank. This scenario involves circular motion and centripetal acceleration, highlighting the importance of the normal force in maintaining the car's trajectory. Understanding these forces is crucial for analyzing motion on banked curves.
Rawr
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Which force is responsible for holding a car in a frictionless banked curve?

The answer is the horizontal component of the normal force. But could anyone explain why that is?

I thought it would be the horizontal component of the weight since normal force is vertical?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rawr said:
I thought it would be the horizontal component of the weight since normal force is vertical?
The weight acts vertically--it has no horizontal component. The normal force is perpendicular to the road surface; since the road is banked (at an angle) that normal force is not vertical.
 
This is a rotational velocity problem. There are two kinda 'normal' forces here. The real vertical normal force to resist gravity, and the horizontal force in the 'normal' directionto accelerate the object along a curve.
 
Last edited:
This is a problem involving circular motion and thus centripetal acceleration. There is only one normal force, which is perpendicular to the road surface. That normal force has vertical and horizontal components.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Coefficient of kinetic friction of a block sliding across the ceiling
Replies
7
Views
1K
Knowing when to decompose weight vector vs. normal vector
Replies
6
Views
2K
Speed of train car when sand spilling out from it
Replies
17
Views
4K
Free body diagrams for boxes, inclined planes and springs
Replies
1
Views
2K
Circular Motion of a Cyclist and a Car going around a bend in the road
Replies
6
Views
4K
Normal force acting on a block on an accelerating wedge
Replies
12
Views
2K
Minimum force to tip the bin over
Replies
7
Views
923
Work done by a normal force (or rather, work NOT done)
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
Stress on a spaghetti rod balanced from its middle
Replies
6
Views
1K
Torque biomechanics
Replies
6
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top