Froce Required to Overcome Friction of Two Boxes

  • Thread starter Thread starter BraedenP
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
AI Thread Summary
To determine the maximum force F that can be applied to the bottom block without the top block slipping, the static friction between the blocks must be considered. The normal force on the top block is calculated to be 19.62N, leading to a static friction force of 8.6328N. The acceleration of the top block is derived from this friction force, resulting in a net force on the bottom block that is not equal to F. Instead, the total force F must account for both the frictional force and the net force required to accelerate the entire system. Ultimately, the correct approach involves recognizing the need to consider the combined mass of both blocks when calculating the applied force.
BraedenP
Messages
94
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two blocks, stacked one on top of the other, can move without friction on the horizontal surface shown in the figure. The surface between the two blocks is rough, however, with a coefficient of static friction equal to 0.44.

If a horizontal force F is applied to the 5.0kg bottom block, what is the maximum value F can have before the 2.0kg top block begins to slip?


Homework Equations


F=ma
F_s=\mu N


The Attempt at a Solution


Basically, I was trying to find the force on the bottom block that would make the force on the top block equal the force of static friction between the boxes.

So I calculated the normal force on the top block to be 19.62N. Then I multiplied that by \mu to get F_s=8.6328N.

The acceleration in the top block that such a force would create is \frac{f}{m_1}=4.3164N. The force on the bottom block required to accelerate the system by this amount is m_2 \cdot a=21.582N

This answer, however, is wrong. I know I took a convoluted route to finding the answer, and obviously it didn't work... How would I approach a problem like this?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're almost there. In your last step you used Newton's second law to find a force on m_2. But this force isn't actually the horizontal force F. What is it?
 
quenderin said:
You're almost there. In your last step you used Newton's second law to find a force on m_2. But this force isn't actually the horizontal force F. What is it?
Oh.. I need to consider the mass of the entire system when calculating the force, right?

So instead, the last equation would be:

(m_1+m_2) \cdot a=30.2148N
 
yeah. alternatively, you should realize that the number 21.582N corresponds to the NET force on m_2. To find the horizontal force F, you've got to add the frictional force exerted by block 2 on block 1, which is 8.6328. You should get the same answer.
 
Oh, okay. That makes sense.

Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top