Automotive Front Wheel Drive or Rear Wheel Drive has higher maximum slip ratio?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between maximum slip ratio and the type of drivetrain, specifically front-wheel drive (FWD) versus rear-wheel drive (RWD). It highlights that FWD vehicles generally have better traction due to the engine's weight being over the front wheels, making them more effective in adverse conditions like snow and rain. However, RWD vehicles are noted for better performance during turns. The graph referenced illustrates that both drivetrain types can achieve the same maximum slip ratio, as slip is necessary to generate friction. Ultimately, the normal force acting on the tire is a more significant factor than whether the vehicle is FWD or RWD.
calvinyeh
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The graph is relationship between longitudinal force and slip ratio under the conditions of 0 longitudinal acceleration and flat road(0 angle of inclination). Which line represent FWD or RWD? Does FWD or RWD have higher maximum slip ratio?
241046
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
too general a question - there are rear wheel front engine vehicles
there are rear whee rear engine vehicles
there are front wheel drive front engine vehicles and the one i really like is
Front wheel drive rear engine vehicle
Buckminster Fuller ( who should have stuck with geodesic domes) introduced the
Dymaxion Chronofile ... i can't make this stuff up!

all with different handling characteristics ..slip ration being one , aspect two dimensional
 
In this case they are both front engine
 
Ok , let us think about this. I assume the chart is for the front tires, correct? Both front engines. which will be able to provide more traction when cornering and why? You have the same forces ( gravity) at static. Why will one be able to handle the straight line momentum better when in a turn? why is this? Both are same tire width, diameter and compound.

The chart is a nice chart but it is just that..a nice chart. there are many many posts relating to tire slip angle on this very mechanical eng forum..suggest you do a search and read upon these.
 
Last edited:
From what I have found, generally FWD vehicles have better traction because the weight of the engine and transmission are over the front wheels. This means better traction in snow and rain than RWD. But RWD has better performance when turning. So does it mean FWD will have a higher maximum slip ratio(before vehicle start slipping) which refers to line 1 in the graph?
 
calvinyeh said:
So does it mean FWD will have a higher maximum slip ratio(before vehicle start slipping) which refers to line 1 in the graph?
The graph you shown is related to a tire, regardless of where it is mounted.

The two cases shown on the graph have both the same maximum slip ratio: 1. When the slip ratio is not equal to zero, the tire is slipping. Slip is necessary to create friction, and thus a friction force (Longitudinal force on the graph). The graph shown relates to the concept of static & kinetic friction like this:

Static+friction+and+kinetic+friction.jpg

The friction force increases linearly in the 'static' region (close to 0 slip); The peak region on your graph relates to the region where it switches from static to kinetic friction. It then stabilizes at a lower constant force at slip ratio = 1.

The difference between the two cases is most likely the normal force acting on the tire. Whether it is RWD or FWD is irrelevant.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top