Function Group vs. Mechanisms approach (Organic Chemistry)

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, participants share their preferred methodologies for tackling mechanism and prediction questions in organic chemistry. A functional group-based approach, as presented in Loudon & Wade, is contrasted with a mechanism-based approach from Clayden, with a consensus that the latter is more effective for predicting organic reactions. Key steps in the mechanism-based methodology include identifying the reaction type (Sn1, Sn2, E1, or E2) and analyzing the starting material's characteristics, such as its classification (aldehyde, ketone, amine, etc.) and whether it is primary, secondary, or tertiary. This analysis helps determine the rate-limiting step and theoretical yields of isomers produced in the reaction.
bacte2013
Messages
394
Reaction score
47
Hello!

For those who took (or have been taking) the organic chemistry, which methodology do you prefer to tackle the mechanism and prediction questions? I have been reading Loudon & Wade (functional group-based) and Clayden (mechanism-based), but I feel like the mechanism-based approach is more useful when predicting the organic reactions...I am just curious about your opinions...

Thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I guess it would be a combination of sorts. First would be the question is this an Sn1, Sn2, E1, or E2. From there you get a good idea of the role each reactant. Next, I like to remind myself of what type of starting material is this reaction is describing (i.e. Aldehyde, ketone, amine, ether, etc.); and is it primary, secondary, or tertiary. From there you can determine the rate limiting step of the reaction and subsequently the theoretical yields of each isomer produced. Is this what you are asking?
 
Back
Top