Galois Theory - Algebraic extensions

  • Thread starter Thread starter adavies
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
adavies
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let M/L and L/K be algebraic field extensions. Is M/K necessarily algebraic?

Homework Equations



Tower law: [M:K]=[M:L][L:K]

The Attempt at a Solution



If both M/L and M/K are finite extensions then by the tower law M/K is also a finite extension, hence is algebraic. So one or both of them must be infinite. The only infinite algebraic extensions I can think of are similar in construction to the algebraic closure of the rationals.
An element m \in M is algebraic over L so we can write \sum a_{i}m^i=0 for some a_i \in L, where i runs from 0 to some n. Might be able to use the fact that L/K is algebraic now?

Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have now singled out an element m and want to show that it's algebraic over K. Consider the tower:
K \subseteq K(a_1,\ldots,a_n) \subseteq K(a_1,\ldots,a_n,m)
You can show that m is algebraic over K(a_1,\ldots,a_n) and you should therefore be able to get back to your finite case.
 
Funnily enough I was just working via this argument on paper to see whether I could delete the thread. At least now I know I was on the right lines, thanks very much!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top