Gauss' Law: Discrete vs Continuous Charges

AI Thread Summary
A Gaussian surface must enclose charges for Gauss's Law to apply effectively. It cannot pass through discrete charges because a point charge is considered to have zero size, making it impossible for the surface to intersect it. In contrast, a continuous charge distribution has a defined size, allowing the Gaussian surface to pass through it. The electric field of a continuous charge is defined everywhere, while it is undefined at the location of a point charge, which invalidates the application of Gauss's Law in that scenario. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for correctly applying Gauss's Law in electrostatics.
physicsprasanna
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
why is it that a gaussian surface cannot pass through discrete charges ... but can pass through a continuous charge distribution??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe technically, the Gaussian surface must enclose the charges, because Gauss's law applies to the enclosed charge.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/gaulaw.html#c2

The electric flux through an area is defined as the electric field multiplied by the area of the surface projected in a plane perpendicular to the field. Gauss's Law is a general law applying to any closed surface. It is an important tool since it permits the assessment of the amount of enclosed charge by mapping the field on a surface outside the charge distribution. For geometries of sufficient symmetry, it simplifies the calculation of the electric field.
Hyperphysics

For Gaussian surfaces -
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/gausur.html#c1

One can put a Gassian surface just outside a distributed charge.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/gausur.html#c3
 
i mean ... yes, the gaussian surface should enclose charges .. but the surface should not pass through a discrete charge... but it can pass through a continuous charge distribution ... why is that?
 
id assume its fairly hard for it to pass through a point charge as you take the "size" of the charge to be 0 and therefore it cannot have anything pass through it, a continuous charge distribution however has a size and then the surface can pass through it
 
may i know what is distribution charge?
 
The electric field of a continuous charge distribution is everywhere defined, while the field of a point charge doesn't exist right at the location of the point charge. I believe that singularity is what invalidates the use of Gauss' law when the surface passes through it.
 
thanks for the replies ... maybe it is due to the fact that the field due to a charge does not exist at the place of the charge.

Thanks once again!
 
lifesfun said:
may i know what is distribution charge?
Simply a collection of charges, but mathematically we treat them as 'uniformly' distributed rather than discrete units.

In a line conductor, the charge is 'linear charge density' or charge/unit length (e.g. C/m).

On a surface conductor, one takes of charge/unit surface (e.g. C/m2) area as though the charges were 'smeared' on the surface. In a conductor, the net charge occurs near the surface because this represents least energy, and the charge units (electrons) are mobile.

In a dielectric, the charges are much less mobile and one can have a volumetric distribution (even non-uniform) of charge.

See - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elefie.html#c1

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/gaulaw.html#c4
 
Back
Top