Gauss Law of Cube in non-uniform linear Electric Field.

AI Thread Summary
Gauss's Law indicates that the electric flux through a Gaussian surface is determined by the enclosed charge, with external fields not contributing to the flux. In the case of a cube in a non-uniform electric field, the flux through opposite faces does not necessarily cancel out, as the field strength varies across the surface. The net flux through the entire surface indicates whether it encloses any net charge; if there is no net charge, the total flux should equal zero. However, in non-uniform fields, one must integrate the flux over all faces to determine the total effect. The discussion highlights the complexity of applying Gauss's Law in varying electric fields.
Hijaz Aslam
Messages
66
Reaction score
1
Gauss's Law states that if a Gaussian Surface encloses a charge ##q_{enc}## then the electric flux through the Gaussian Surface is given by ##\phi=q_{enc}/\varepsilon_{o}## .

It also states that any external field does not contribute to the Electric Flux through the Gaussian Surface.

I am bit confused over there. If we have Gaussian Surface which is a cube placed in a non-uniform linear electric charge (by an infinite sheet for instance, and the Electric Field is parallel (anti-parallel) to the area vector of one of the faces (and the opposite face) ) the Flux through the two opposite faces of the cube does not cancel out. Is this true? What does the Gauss's Law actually states (along with conditions)?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Gauss' Law for electrical flux is concerned with total flux through the whole closed surface, not through the opposite faces/parts of the surface.
 
zoki85 said:
Gauss' Law for electrical flux is concerned with total flux through the whole closed surface, not through the opposite faces/parts of the surface.

Yes of course not. I forgot to mention the direction of the Electric Field relative to the Cube. Please see the edited question.
 
Net flux through the gaussian surface indicates wether it encloses a net charge or not. No net flux means the surface doesn't enclose any net charge.
For example, if the gaussian surface is a cube placed in an external field, and if cube encloses no net charge, than flux through any two opposite pair of faces must cancel out regardless of direction of external field. BTW, your question is more appropriate for general physics subforum than here.
 
zoki85 - But in the case of non-uniform electric field it does not cancel out the flux of opposite faces, does it?

Can I somehow shift this question to the General Physics section?
 
In general case of nonuniform fields, total net flux is 0 (if qin=0), but you have to integrate over all the faces of the gaussian surface.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
83
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top