Solving Part e of the Electron Beam Problem

AI Thread Summary
Part e of the Electron Beam Problem discusses the electric field contributions from an electron beam and positively charged ions in plasma. The confusion arises over whether the effects of negatively charged electrons in the plasma negate those of the positive ions. It is suggested that, in a steady-state scenario, the electron beam repels plasma electrons, leaving only positive ions in the vicinity, which contribute to the electric field. An analogy is drawn to a negative charge inside a hollow metal shell, illustrating how charges can be expelled despite attractive forces. The discussion highlights the need for clarity in the problem's wording and solution.
phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
Homework Statement
Please refer to the picture below
Relevant Equations
Gauss's Law
Ampere's Law
I am only asking about part e. If you are short on time, you can read through parts a - d, to get an idea of what is happening, and then attempt part e directly.
Screenshot 2021-04-26 at 1.27.31 AM.png

I have solved parts a - d. If you would like to check your answers, the answer to part c is [rne^2 / 2e0] [ 1 - (v/c)^2], and the answer to part d is 0.
I do not understand the following solution to part e. The term on the left represents the E-field due to the electron beam, which I understand. I suppose the term on the right is the E-field due to the positively charged ions in the plasma. However, isn't the effect of the positively charged ions in the plasma negated by the effect of the negatively charged electrons in the plasma? Thus, the term on the right should not exist. What is wrong?
Screenshot 2021-04-26 at 1.31.07 AM.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here’s a guess…

I suspect the key phrase in part e) is “… long after the beam entering the plasma.”

In the long-term (when a steady-state has been reached), the plasma-electrons will have been largely expelled from the region radius r’ due to repulsion by the electron beam. So what remains of the plasma are the positive ions only. The electric field at r’ is then the sum of the fields from the electron beam and positive plasma ions.

It’s not entirely consistent with the wording of question and solution, but maybe these are simply poorly written.

I haven't checked your other answers.
 
Steve4Physics said:
Here’s a guess…

I suspect the key phrase in part e) is “… long after the beam entering the plasma.”

In the long-term (when a steady-state has been reached), the plasma-electrons will have been largely expelled from the region radius r’ due to repulsion by the electron beam. So what remains of the plasma are the positive ions only. The electric field at r’ is then the sum of the fields from the electron beam and positive plasma ions.

It’s not entirely consistent with the wording of question and solution, but maybe these are simply poorly written.

I haven't checked your other answers.
Thanks for the reply. May I know how the electrons can be expelled, given that the positive ions also exert an attractive force on them?
 
phantomvommand said:
Thanks for the reply. May I know how the electrons can be expelled, given that the positive ions also exert an attractive force on them?
Suppose you put a negative charge, -q, inside a hollow metal spherical shell. Some of the metal’s electrons are pushed out (‘expelled’) onto the outer surface, giving an outer-surface charge of -q and leaving an inner-surface charge of +q.

Not the best analogy, but the underlying principle is the same as the electron-beam and plasma in your question.

The ‘expulsion’ of plasma-electrons is from the region around the electron-beam into more distant regions.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top