Gauss's law and nonuniform electric field

AI Thread Summary
A Gaussian surface shaped as a cube with an edge length of 1.40m is analyzed under a nonuniform electric field E=[-4i+(6+3y)j]N/C. The solution manual indicates that the constant part of the electric field, E0=-4i+6j, does not contribute to the flux because its effects cancel out across opposite faces of the cube. When calculating flux for individual faces, the constant vector does produce a nonzero flux on one side, but an equal and opposite flux on the opposite side results in a net flux of zero. This understanding stems from the principle that the total flux through a closed surface must account for contributions from all sides. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering both constant and variable components of electric fields in flux calculations.
boredbluejay
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A Gaussian surface is in the shape of a cube with edge length 1.40m. The electric field is E=[-4i+(6+3y)j]N/C.

I got an answer, but the solution manual stated that we treat the electric field as E=3yj+E0, where E0=-4i+6j, which does not contribute to the flux. Why is this? Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The flux of a constant vector is zero as the contribution from one side of the cube is positive and negative from the opposite side.

ehild
 
Ah, okay. I didn't know that. But when calculating the flux of individual faces, does the constant vector contribute?
 
You know how to get a flux of a vector field B(r) at an surface area A? you integrate the normal component of the vector B : Φ=∫BndA.
The normal component refers to the outward normal. Although there is nonzero flux from the constant vector on on side, there is the same with opposite sign on the opposite side.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top