Gauss's Law and Superposition of Fields

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 7K views
gadje
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Gauss's Law and Superposition of Fields (edited again, something else wrong)

Homework Statement


attachment.php?attachmentid=25861&stc=1&d=1274275158.png


Right. The shape itself has charge Q, so it has charge density [tex]\frac{Q}{\frac{4}{3} \pi R^3 - \frac{4}{3} \pi (\frac{R}{2})^3} = \frac{6Q}{7\pi R^3}[/tex] Let's call this [tex]\rho[/tex]. If it were filled in entirely, then, it would have charge:

[tex]Q + \rho V = Q + \frac{6Q}{7\pi R^3}\cdot \frac{4}{3}\pi\left(\frac{R}{2}\right)^3 = \frac{8}{7} Q[/tex]. (V being the volume of the small sphere.)

By Gauss's Law, the field at the surface of this filled sphere would be:

[tex]E = \frac{\frac{8}{7}Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 R^2} = \frac{2}{7 \pi \epsilon_0 R^2}[/tex]

Considering now the smaller, negatively charged sphere, this would be carrying a charge of

[tex]-\rho V = -\frac{6Q}{7\pi R^3} \cdot \frac{4}{3}\pi \left(\frac{R}{2}\right)^3 = -\frac{Q}{7}[/tex].

The electric field at its surface would then be [tex]\frac{\frac{-Q}{7}}{4 \pi \epsilon (\frac{R}{2})^2} = -\frac{Q}{7 \pi \epsilon _0 R^2}[/tex].

The electric field at P of the shape, then, is the sum of the individual fields of the filled sphere and the negatively charged sphere - I don't get the answer I'm meant to, and I can't see what I've done wrong. It's probably something really stupid.
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2010-05-19 at 14.18.16.png
    Screen shot 2010-05-19 at 14.18.16.png
    36.5 KB · Views: 2,395
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh yeah. I didn't notice that 4 in the denominator. Knew it was something stupid! Cheers.