(General question)Area charge density and electric potential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential of a spherical shell of uniform charge using two methods. The first method employs Gauss's Law, yielding the potential as ##V=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R}##, while the second method, integrating the charge density, results in ##V=\frac{Q}{2\pi\epsilon_0 R}##, indicating an inconsistency. The confusion arises from the integration limits and the interpretation of charge distribution within the shell. Clarification on the thickness of the shell and the integration process is essential for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law
  • Familiarity with electric potential equations
  • Knowledge of charge density concepts
  • Basic calculus for integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of electric potential using Gauss's Law
  • Study the concept of charge density in spherical coordinates
  • Learn about the implications of integrating over different charge distributions
  • Explore potential differences in electrostatics and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, as well as anyone involved in theoretical or applied physics requiring a solid understanding of electric potential and charge distributions.

prodo123
Messages
17
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Sorry, the post isn't about a single homework problem but rather something that I keep getting confused on. It's about calculating the electric potential of a spherical shell of uniform charge in two different ways.

Homework Equations


##\Delta V=\int_a^b -\vec E\cdot d\vec r##
##V=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int\frac{dq}{r}##
Gauss's Law

The Attempt at a Solution


Taking ##V=0## at ##r\to\infty##, the electric potential of a spherical shell of charge ##Q## with radius ##R## should be:

##V=\int^R_\infty -\vec E\cdot d\vec r##

Using Gauss's Law, the electric field outside the shell is ##\vec E = \frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r^2}\hat r##. This gives ##V=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0}(\frac{1}{R}-\frac{1}{\infty})=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R}##, which is what we expect.
The charge area density for the shell is ##\sigma=\frac{Q}{4\pi R^2}=\frac{q}{A}##. Having A be the surface area for a sphere, the function for the charge of a spherical shell of radius r is:

##q(r)=\sigma A = \frac{Q}{4\pi R^2}(4\pi r^2)=Q\frac{r^2}{R^2}##

The infinitesimal charge is therefore ##dq=\frac{2Q}{R^2}r dr##.

Since electric potentials for a distribution of charge is found by ##V=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int\frac{dq}{r}##, the ##r## variables cancel out and the integral reduces to ##V=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int^R_0\frac{2Q}{R^2}dr##.

Evaluating the integral gives ##V=\frac{Q}{2\pi\epsilon_0 R}##, which is not what's expected. There's a factor of 2 somewhere that's throwing off the answers. Where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
prodo123 said:
a spherical shell of uniform charge
How thick is the shell ? You integrate from 0 to R but is that really where the charge resides ?
 
BvU said:
How thick is the shell ? You integrate from 0 to R but is that really where the charge resides ?
##A_{\text{sphere}}=R^2\iint sin(\theta)d\theta d\phi## where ##\pi \ge \theta \ge 0## and ##2\pi\ge\phi\ge 0## for an infinitely thin spherical shell
Leaving ##\phi## as a variable gives the following:
##A=2R^2\int d\phi##
##dA = 2R^2 d\phi##
##q=\sigma A##
##dq = \sigma dA = 2\sigma R^2 d\phi##
##V=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int^{2\pi} _0 (\frac{1}{R})2\sigma R^2 d\phi##
##V=\frac{\sigma R}{\epsilon_0} = \frac{\frac{Q}{4\pi R^2}R}{\epsilon_0}##
##V=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R}##
Right...thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
678
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
681