How Does Snell's Law Help Calculate Distance Between Parallel Lines?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on using Snell's Law to derive the distance between two parallel lines. Participants emphasize the importance of identifying all relevant angles and triangles in the problem, particularly a right-angled triangle involving the angle of incidence. There is a suggestion to express the relationships between the angles and the height of the triangle to simplify the proof. The need to eliminate extraneous terms while adhering to the conditions set by Snell's Law is also highlighted. Overall, a structured approach involving geometric relationships is essential for solving the problem.
Shaun97
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I can't seem to find the proof for the distance between the two parallel lines.
VUJb7oV.jpg


Homework Equations

: Snells law: μ1sinθ1=μ2sinθ2
Sin (A+B)= sinAcosB + sinBcosA[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution

: tried using the parallel lines to get a result in terms of the initial angle of incidence ϑ, as the lateral deviation creates a right angle triangle.
eO5oLwc.jpg
[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thats a good start... you need the other angles too.
There's another rt angled triangle that may be useful in there.
It also helps to explicitly state exactly what you want to prove.
 
there's the rt angled triangle with alpha (α) as one of the angles and with t as the height of it, and as the answer is also in terms of t I assume it's necessary to do something with this triangle but at the same time the answer only contains one angle, ϑ.
 
You have to start by writing down relations involving the different triangles ... then you can think about how you can use them to get the relation you need to prove.

Clearly you need to find a way to get rid of the terms that are not in the final form. Don't forget that some of the angles are related through Snell's Law. Make sure you have identified all the triangles ...
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top