Giancoli, 3rd Ed, pr. 55: Ellastic collision. Solved, but is there easier way?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bjnartowt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving an elastic collision problem involving a neutron and a helium nucleus, focusing on determining the rebound angle and speeds post-collision. The conservation of kinetic energy and momentum equations are utilized, leading to a quadratic equation for the neutron's speed. Participants suggest that the quadratic can be simplified through careful algebra, and one participant points out a mistake in the momentum equation regarding the helium nucleus's mass. The conversation highlights the challenge of avoiding the quadratic formula while emphasizing the importance of accurate calculations. Overall, the discussion underscores the complexity of elastic collision problems in physics.
bjnartowt
Messages
265
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



A neutron collides elastically with an at-rest helium-nucleus. Masses are approximately "m" and "4m", respectively. Helium nucleus rebounds at 45-degree angle

What angle does the neutron rebound at?

What are speeds of two particles after collision?

Notation:
\begin{array}{l}<br /> {v_{4m}} = \left[ {{\rm{pre - collision He - nucleus velocity}}} \right] = 0 \\ <br /> {v_m} = \left[ {{\rm{pre - collision He - nucleus velocity}}} \right] = 6.5 \times {10^5}{\textstyle{m \over s}} \\ <br /> {{v&#039;}_{4m}} = \left[ {{\rm{post - collision He - nucleus velocity}}} \right] = ? \\ <br /> {{v&#039;}_m} = \left[ {{\rm{post - collision He - nucleus velocity}}} \right] = ? \\ <br /> \end{array}



Homework Equations


Kinetic energy conservation, simplified, and with appropreiate zero of initial He-nucleus velocity put in, and with factor of (1/2)*m canceled out:
{v_m}^2 = 4{v&#039;_{4m}}^2 + {v&#039;_m}^2

x-component momentum conservation with factor of "m" struck out:
6.5 \times {10^5}{\textstyle{m \over s}} = {{v&#039;}_m}\cos \theta + 4{{v&#039;}_{4m}}\cos 45

y-component momentum conservation with factor of "m" struck out:
\sin \theta = - \sin 45{\textstyle{{{{v&#039;}_{4m}}} \over {{{v&#039;}_m}}}}


The Attempt at a Solution



Isolate {{{v&#039;}_m}} and put next to trig functions and square both sides in preparation to add them together to get a {\sin ^2} + {\cos ^2} simplification:

\begin{array}{l}<br /> {\left( {{{v&#039;}_m}\cos \theta } \right)^2} = {\left( {6.5 \times {{10}^5}{\textstyle{m \over s}} - 2\sqrt 2 {{v&#039;}_{4m}}} \right)^2} \\ <br /> {\left( {{{v&#039;}_m}\sin \theta } \right)^2} = {\left( { - {{v&#039;}_{4m}}\sin 45} \right)^2} \\ <br /> \end{array}

Adding these equations and using the abovementioned {\sin ^2} + {\cos ^2} leads to:
{({{v&#039;}_m})^2} = {6.5^2} \times {10^{10}} + 8{({{v&#039;}_{4m}})^2} - 2 \cdot 6.5 \times {10^5} \cdot 2\sqrt 2 {{v&#039;}_{4m}} + {\textstyle{1 \over 2}}{({{v&#039;}_{4m}})^2}

Then: use the kinetic-energy balance mentioned way earlier to eliminate an unknown.


THE QUESTION: This leads to the quadratic formula. I am studying to take the Physics GRE. Is there a way to avoid the quadratic formula? Some sort of physical-intuition-shortcut? I tried visiting the CM frame briefly, but that makes things a bit messy...but perhaps I didn't look hard enough?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a mistake in your momentum y equation. You dropped the factor of four that comes from the mass of the helium nucleus.

Your approach is fine. The quadratic you get is factorable if you do the algebra correctly, with one root being v'4m=0. It might help not to plug in the value for vm so early.
 
I mean yeah, unless you know scattering formulas off the top of your head you will have to derive the result just like you have here. Though fix your error as stated above.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top