Given potential, ask plane charge distribution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the charge distribution on the xy-plane given a specific electric potential above it. The potential is expressed as φ = φ_0 exp(-kz) cos(kx), leading to the derived electric field components E_x and E_z. A charge distribution σ_z can be calculated to produce E_z, but the participants are uncertain about how to derive σ_x for E_x. The conversation suggests that the periodic nature of the potential implies a specific charge distribution, and there is consideration of non-uniform charge distributions affecting the electric field's behavior. Ultimately, the focus remains on finding a suitable charge distribution that aligns with the given potential and electric field characteristics.
Tekk
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



All charges in space are distributed on the xy-plane. The potential above the plane is known as
\phi = \phi_0 exp(-kz) cos(kx)

What's the charge distribution on xy-plane?

Homework Equations



\vec E =- grad(\phi)

The Attempt at a Solution



Applying the relationship between \vec E and \phi, I have found:

E_x = k \phi_0 exp(-kz) sin(kx)
E_z = k \phi_0 exp(-kz) cos(kx)

I know that a charge distribution \sigma_z = \frac{E_z}{2\pi} would produce E_z. But how about E_x?
I am thinking of a superposition of \sigma_z and \sigma_x to produce \vec E. So the question now is to find \sigma_x: what kind of charge distribution on the plane would produce E_x = k \phi_0 exp(-kz) sin(kx)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see how a constant charge density would lead to the cosine term (or even the exponential).

Your potential is periodic in x and does not depend on y, what do you expect for the charge distribution?
Does this problem appear in the context of Fourier transformations?
 
mfb said:
I don't see how a constant charge density would lead to the cosine term (or even the exponential).

Your potential is periodic in x and does not depend on y, what do you expect for the charge distribution?
Does this problem appear in the context of Fourier transformations?

No, the problem is not appeared in the context of Fourier transformation. It is the problem 31(c) from Chapter 2: Electric Potential of Purcell 2ed E&M textbook. Purcell asks us to describe the charge distribution on the non-conducting flat sheet.

I neither see how a charge distribution would lead to an exponential decay along the z-axis. But what if the charge is not uniformly distributed in the plane? Specifically, let the charge only distributed on a finite circle, then the electric field at least decay along the z-axis. My reason is: in the very far, we could treat this circle as a point charge, so the electric field it produce would decay.

If we temporary don't care the electrical field far away and focus only on the location very near to the xy-plane, in that case, z approaches to zero, E_z = kϕ_0cos(kx). I can find a charge distribution \sigma_z = \frac{E_z}{2\pi} = \frac{kϕ_0}{2\pi}cos(kx) to produce E_z, at least when z is very small. But I have no idea how to find \sigma_x to produce E_x. Do you have any suggestion. A qualitative approach is welcome.
 
Tekk said:
so the electric field it produce would decay.
But not exponentially.
The approach with very small z could work. Can you calculate Ez for all z based on this charge distribution?

I think if one fits, the other one will fit as well, so I would not worry about Ex for now.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top