Got a question with substitution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MRAI
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Substitution
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around using the Substitution method to maximize the expression 4x - 2xy + 3y under the constraint 4x - y = 2. The initial steps involve substituting y with 4x - 2 into the original equation. Participants suggest differentiating the resulting expression with respect to x to find critical points for maximum or minimum values. However, there is a debate on whether this problem is calculus-based or not, with some advocating for the use of the Lagrange method as a more elegant solution. Ultimately, the conversation highlights different approaches to solving optimization problems in mathematics.
MRAI
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Using the Substitution method, find the maximum value of

4x-2xy+3y subject to the constraint 4x-y=2

I can do the 1st part:

4x-y=2--->
4x-2=y

substitute this into the original equation:
4x-2x(4x-2)+3(4x-2)

Hope that right so far! but don't know where to go from there? anyone could help please?

thanks ;)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
then you differentiate wrt x and equal to zero to find max/min
 
what do u mean by wrt?
 
"wrt" : "with respect to"
CartoonKid was assuming this was a calculus problem. The standard method for solving "maximum- minimum" problems in calculus is to differentiate and set the derivative equal to 0. But since you apparently weren't aware of that, I suspect this is not a calculus problem!

If you multiply y= 4x-2x(4x-2)+3(4x-2) out, you get a quadratic. If you are doing problems like this, I presume you know how to complete the square to find the vertex of the graph which, in this problem, gives you the maximum value.

So: multiply this out, then complete the square.
 
This method is totally counterproductive...The method discovered by Lagrange is much more elegant...

Daniel.
 
But one would need a rather intermediate mathematical background to use them...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top