Graph of a cart in motion using ticker tape

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a lab exercise involving a cart attached to a mass via a pulley, where ticker tape is used to record motion. The user calculates velocity using the formula v = d/t but is confused because the resulting graph appears linear, suggesting constant acceleration, contrary to the teacher's assertion that it should resemble a root curve due to non-constant acceleration. Participants clarify that the data may actually represent displacement rather than velocity, as the differences in values indicate a non-linear relationship. They emphasize the need to analyze the ticker tape data correctly to determine true velocity. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately interpreting experimental data in physics.
Mystikal69
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Ok this is more of a problem I am having within a lab exercise. The scenario is this, I have a cart attached to a string that is attached to a mass of 100g hanging off the ground with a pulley.. So the cart is on a table, the string goes upwards, hooks around a pulley and goes downwards attached to a mass. I have ticker tape showing the motion of the cart then using time and displacement, I got velocity using v = d/t, and the data is as follows:
Time Speed
1 5.3
2 6
3 7.3
4 8.8
5 10.5
6 12
7 15
8 18
9 21


Homework Equations


v = d/t

The Attempt at a Solution


My problem is, that the teacher stated "It should be non-linear and resemble a root curve because the acceleration is not constant." However, when I graph this, the v-t graph is a straight line meaning that the acceleration is constant! To me, it makes sense that the acceleration is constant because there is a constant mass pulling on the cart with a constant force, the angle but my teacher says its not. Now I can easily change my data to whatever I want it to, my teacher has no problem with that, however I don't know what a root curve is supose to look like? is it like the graph of y = root(x) or is it more like y = 2^x?? Or maybe I am missing something and the data i have is right? i don't no, please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The data you have given is definitely not a straight line graph.
Look
between the 1st two values the difference is 6-5.3= 0.7
between the last two values it's 21-18 = 3
This will not give a straight line graph.
Is your data actually displacement against time? (Not velocity?)
The displacement against time graph will look like that.
In order to find the velocity of the cart, you need to do a calculation on the dots from the ticker tape. It's not read off directly.
If you have just read off directly from the tape, I'm certain that what you have measure is displacement, not velocity.
How did you find velocity?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top