Graphing Exponential Functions

anthonych414
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
I can't seem to understand the procedure, can anyone post any links to a useful tutorial? I took it this year and it was the only thing I didn't understand, 3 questions about it came in my maths final and I got an 82 (I got everything else right but I made a small calculation mistake in a question involving trig in space), and since I plan on taking AP calculus next year I want to understand the concept.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There's a limited amount you can do by hand. The most important part of graphing something like y = a^x (a>1) is to notice that:

1) It's monotone increasing
2) It has a horizontal asymptote at y = 0 as x approaches -inf
3) A y-intercept of y = 1
4) The graph gradually gets steeper the farther right you go.
5) The "steepness" depends on a. Larger a means that graph approaches infinity much faster

As far as wanting more detail than this, pick easy values to calculate. e.g.

y = 2^x

x y
1 2
2 4
3 8
4 16

If a is not an integer, just plug in a few values in your calculator and graph it that way.

edit: fixed bullet 3
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the help, I now have a better understanding of the concept and I will solve some exercises to perfect my technique.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top