Graphing question: Reversal of x and y axis & effect on slope and y-intercept

AI Thread Summary
Reversing the x and y-axis on a linear graph maintains its linearity, resulting in a reflection along the line y=x. In the original equation, where y represents V^2 and x represents d, the slope is 2a and the y-intercept is Vi^2. Upon reversing the axes, the new equation becomes d = (V^2)(1/2a) - (Vi^2)/2a, indicating that the new slope is 1/2a and the new y-intercept is -Vi^2/2a. The transformation confirms that the graph remains linear despite the axis reversal. The solution provided aligns with the expected mathematical principles.
unigal13
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

How does the slope and y-intercept change if you reverse the x and y-axis of a linear graph. Will the graph still be linear?

The original y=mx+b format followed the physics equation:
V^2 = 2a(d) + Vi^2

Therefore, when y was "V^2" while x was "d", the y-intercept was Vi^2 and the slope was equal to "2a".

What are the y-int and slope once the axis are reversed, and x is "V^2" and y is "d"?

The attempt at a solution

I'm sure this is quite simple, but for some reason I am stumped. I realize the new graph would still be linear, reflected along y=x.
I tried inserting the new x and y values into the equation, getting:
x = my + b

(x - b)/m = y

(v^2 - vi^2)/2a = d

so (v^2)(1/2a) - (vi^2)/2a = d

leaves the new equation in the form of mx + b = y

with m = 1/2a
and b = (-vi^2)/2a

Have I come to the correct solution?

Thanks a lot!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No one can confirm my work?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top