Grassmann numbers and Fermions

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
kelly0303
Messages
573
Reaction score
33
Hello! I am a bit confused about fermions in QFT when they are considered grassmann numbers. If you have 2 grassmann numbers ##\theta_1## and ##\theta_2##, something of the form ##\theta_1\theta_2\theta_1\theta_2## gives zero. However, a term in a QED lagrangian of the form ##\bar{\psi(x)}\psi(x)\bar{\psi(x)}\psi(x)## is not automatically zero. If fermions are Grassmann numbers, why isn't that term also zero?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arivero
Physics news on Phys.org
Fermions are not Grassmann numbers. Fermions are quantum particles with Fermi-Dirac statistics.
That statistics can be expressed by the fact that their creation operators are elements of a Grassmann algebra, and dually their annihilation operators are also elements of a (dual) Grassmann algebra. But the full algebra of Fermi-Dirac creation and annihilation operators forms a neutral signature Clifford Algebra.

Specifically:
[tex]\bar{\psi}_a(x)\psi_b(y) +\psi_b(y)\bar{\psi}_a(x) = \delta_{ab} \delta(y-x)\boldsymbol{1}[/tex]
(That's the Kronecker and Dirac delta functions on the r.h.s.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arivero
kelly0303 said:
Hello! I am a bit confused about fermions in QFT when they are considered grassmann numbers. If you have 2 grassmann numbers ##\theta_1## and ##\theta_2##, something of the form ##\theta_1\theta_2\theta_1\theta_2## gives zero. However, a term in a QED lagrangian of the form ##\bar{\psi(x)}\psi(x)\bar{\psi(x)}\psi(x)## is not automatically zero. If fermions are Grassmann numbers, why isn't that term also zero?
Well, how do you do derive that ##\theta_1\theta_2\theta_1\theta_2## gives zero? I guess you write ##\theta_1\theta_2\theta_1\theta_2 = - \theta_1\theta_1\theta_2\theta_2 = -0 \times 0 = 0##.

So the question is: if you write out the term ##\bar{\psi}(x)\psi(x)\bar{\psi}(x)\psi(x)## explicitly in spinorcomponents of ##\psi##, what do you get? I leave that explicit writing out to you; that's the essential part of your question, I think ;) So pick a basis and write it out.

edit: your tex-code should read \bar{\psi}(x) instead of \bar{\psi(x)} for readability if you ever want to use that in your own texts.