Gravitation, really hard at least for me

  • Thread starter Thread starter Puchinita5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation Hard
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the gravitational force between a particle and a uniform rod using integration. The user correctly identifies the density of the rod and sets up the integral for gravitational force, but initially arrives at an incorrect answer. A key point raised is the importance of clearly defining the limits of integration, which can affect the final result. A common mistake noted is the failure to convert units from centimeters to meters, leading to a significant error in the final answer. The user ultimately learns from the experience and emphasizes the importance of careful calculations in physics problems.
Puchinita5
Messages
178
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In Fig. 13-41, a particle of mass m1 = 0.23 kg is a distance d = 84 cm from one end of a uniform rod with length L = 6.4 m and mass M = 2.4 kg. What is the magnitude of the gravitational force on the particle from the rod?

Homework Equations


http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs1650/art/qb/qu/c13/fig13_41.gif

The Attempt at a Solution


ok...so i figured that the desnity of the rod, M/L should be the same for dm/dr...so then dm=(M/L)dx. (i thought just to visualize easier i made dr into dx, so it looked like a coordinate system to me)

then i figured i had to integrate F=int (dF)

so i did F= int (Gmdm)/(x+d)^2...since dm=(M/L)dx this made the integral
int (GmMdx)/L(x+d)^2

further simplifying i got F= (GmM/L) integral dx(x+d)^2

after integration i got F= GmM/L multiplied by -(x+d)^-1 from 0 to L...

then i solved, etc. but got the wrong answer...any idea if this is totally off or if i made a silly mistake somewhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks correct...
 
It looks correct to me, too. However, I would just make a comment on your integral: you should be more explicit about the limits. E.g. I did a change of variables that changed my limits to d and L+d (but anyway I got the same result as you).

Maybe you just forgot to convert cm to m?
 
i'm an idiot... the answer was about 6.05e-12, and when i plugged it into the website i left out the e-12...what a silly mistake! well, i have looked at it sooo many times at least that i will never forget how to do this problem...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top