Gravitational Force(Why the negative sign?)

AI Thread Summary
Gravitational forces are considered negative due to the convention used in coordinate systems, where attractive forces are represented as acting inward. This negative sign indicates that gravitational forces only attract, unlike electromagnetic forces which can both attract and repel. The gravitational potential energy is also negative because it is defined as the work done against the gravitational force when moving a mass from a reference point, typically at infinity, to a specific location. The negative sign in potential energy reflects the nature of gravitational attraction and the reference point chosen. Understanding these conventions clarifies why the signs are used in gravitational equations.
Gunman
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How come it is said that attractive forces such as gravitational force have negative sign? And how come the sign is ignored in the case of gravitational force? And also, how come gravitational potential energy carries a negative sign? Is it because the displacement of the object is always below the reference point which is infinity?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


My notes state that the negative sign is omitted because gravitational repulsion doesnot exist. I don't exactly comprehend that. What is meant by gravitational repulsion?

Thanks for any help given to help me clarify my doubts. =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Force is a vector, it has a direction. Signs of the forces depends on which coordinate system you use.

Gravitionial repulsion is that masses don't repel, only attract. As in electromagnic force, you have positive and negative charges. Opposite sign attract, and same sign repel.
 
  • Like
Likes kafn8
Forces are vectors - they are neither negative nor positive. A COMPONENT of a force can be negative or positive depending on whether it goes in the plus direction of your coordinate system or minus. There are NOT two different classes of forces called 'negative' and 'positive'.
 
How come it is said that attractive forces such as gravitational force have negative sign?
The negative sign is just a convention. When we use a coordinate system in which the unit vector points in a direction opposite to that of the force, then we need a negative sign to show that. In the case of gravity (gravitostatics), it's usually the spherical polar coordinates with the "source mass" at the origin. On the other hand, the magnitude of the force does not carry a negative sign, since magnitude by definition is positive.

And how come the sign is ignored in the case of gravitational force?

Did you mean to ask something else?

And also, how come gravitational potential energy carries a negative sign? Is it because the displacement of the object is always below the reference point which is infinity?

The case for the potential is a result of defining the force with a negative sign. The potential is defined as the negative of line integral of the force, integrated from a reference point to a point where you need to find the potential. If you're not familiar with vector calculus, I'll put it another way: It's the work you need to do against the gravitational force to bring a "test mass" from a reference point (usually infinity) to a particular point in the field.
 
Ohh. Okay thanks people. =) The replies helpes greatly.
 
The formulas for gravitational forces and electric forces use the convential that the unit vector is radially outward (direction of repulsion)... So a positive value in the formula means the force is acting radially outward (repulsive)... when you get a negative value the force is radially inward (attractive).

But for potential energy this convention doesn't matter you'll get the same result either way... because energy is a scalar. The potential energy when two masses are to a distance of R2 - the potential energy when they are at R1 =

\deltaE = - Gm_1m_2/R_2 - (-Gm_1m_2/R_1)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top